This paper reports on an experiment designed to test whether pairs of individuals are able to exploit ex ante efficiency gains in the sharing of a risky financial prospect. Observations from a previous experiment had suggested a general rejection of efficiency in favour of ex post equality. The present experiment explores some possible explanations for this. The results indicate that fairness is not a significant consideration, but rather that having to choose between prospects diverts partners from allocating the chosen prospect efficiently. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004risk-sharing, experiment, bargaining, fairness,
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...
This paper reports on an experiment designed to test whether pairs of individuals are able to exploi...
Choices involving risk significantly affect the distribution of income and wealth in society, but t...
We investigate risk-sharing without commitment by designing an experiment to match a simple model of...
Systematic experiments with distribution games (for a survey, see Roth, 1995) have shown that partic...
Fairness is a strong concern as shown by the robust results of dictator giving and ultimatum experim...
We use an experiment to study the effect of ex-post sharing rules on relationship-specific investmen...
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of American Economic Association publicatio...
Systematic experiments with distribution games (for a survey, see Roth, 1995, ) have shown that part...
We use an experiment to study the effect of ex-post sharing rules on relationship-specific investmen...
This paper presents the first laboratory study of risk-sharing without commitment. Our experiment c...
Systematic experiments with distribution games (for a survey, see Roth, 1995) have shown that partic...
When rational risk-averse agents must choose among and share monetary risks, it is known that effici...
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...
This paper reports on an experiment designed to test whether pairs of individuals are able to exploi...
Choices involving risk significantly affect the distribution of income and wealth in society, but t...
We investigate risk-sharing without commitment by designing an experiment to match a simple model of...
Systematic experiments with distribution games (for a survey, see Roth, 1995) have shown that partic...
Fairness is a strong concern as shown by the robust results of dictator giving and ultimatum experim...
We use an experiment to study the effect of ex-post sharing rules on relationship-specific investmen...
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of American Economic Association publicatio...
Systematic experiments with distribution games (for a survey, see Roth, 1995, ) have shown that part...
We use an experiment to study the effect of ex-post sharing rules on relationship-specific investmen...
This paper presents the first laboratory study of risk-sharing without commitment. Our experiment c...
Systematic experiments with distribution games (for a survey, see Roth, 1995) have shown that partic...
When rational risk-averse agents must choose among and share monetary risks, it is known that effici...
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...
Risk sharing arrangements diminish individuals’ vulnerability to probabilistic events that negativel...