Add to ORKGMr. Rudolph reviews approximately thirteen years of legal and political developments that have contributed to laws governing the extent to which private firms may secure rights in technology at least partly developed with federal funds
Most studies of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act have focused on universities. In contrast, we analy...
Recent government policy changes that have resulted in encouraging or requiring increased intellectu...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "The Bayh-Dole ...
Mr. Rudolph reviews approximately thirteen years of legal and political developments that have contr...
Dr. Drucker, who has lab-wide responsibility for technology transfer at Argonne National Laboratory,...
The government\u27s pro-patent policy may not be the best way to promote technological advances. Thi...
A critical examination of a policy designed to encourage commercial exploitation of federally funded...
Mr. Harnett argues that emphasizing technology transfer at institutions such as the National Institu...
Federal policy since 1980 has reflected an increasingly confident presumption that patenting discov...
This article revisits the logical and empirical basis for current government patent policy in order ...
This article will use the NIH patent controversy as a focal point for considering when the results o...
In this paper we review the legislative emphasis on technology transfers from U.S. federal laborator...
This article analyzes the interrelationship among technology transfer mechanisms using data specific...
Professor Eisenberg argues against a system providing for federally-sponsored inventions to be paten...
"This report examines the use of intellectual property rights in Federal technology transfer, focusi...
Most studies of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act have focused on universities. In contrast, we analy...
Recent government policy changes that have resulted in encouraging or requiring increased intellectu...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "The Bayh-Dole ...
Mr. Rudolph reviews approximately thirteen years of legal and political developments that have contr...
Dr. Drucker, who has lab-wide responsibility for technology transfer at Argonne National Laboratory,...
The government\u27s pro-patent policy may not be the best way to promote technological advances. Thi...
A critical examination of a policy designed to encourage commercial exploitation of federally funded...
Mr. Harnett argues that emphasizing technology transfer at institutions such as the National Institu...
Federal policy since 1980 has reflected an increasingly confident presumption that patenting discov...
This article revisits the logical and empirical basis for current government patent policy in order ...
This article will use the NIH patent controversy as a focal point for considering when the results o...
In this paper we review the legislative emphasis on technology transfers from U.S. federal laborator...
This article analyzes the interrelationship among technology transfer mechanisms using data specific...
Professor Eisenberg argues against a system providing for federally-sponsored inventions to be paten...
"This report examines the use of intellectual property rights in Federal technology transfer, focusi...
Most studies of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act have focused on universities. In contrast, we analy...
Recent government policy changes that have resulted in encouraging or requiring increased intellectu...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "The Bayh-Dole ...