Add to ORKGThe final paper from the symposium on public participation in Risk management discusses existing procedures for ensuring the integrity of advisory committee recommendations. It concludes that they are inadequate and argues that accountability would be better served if nonexperts were included. It also suggests that, in any event, measures need to be taken to indicate, e.g., the bases for committee conclusions
In the United States, the risk assessment − risk management paradigm that underpins federal decision...
An introduction to the legal framework within which employees of the twigs on our fourth branch of...
The past three or more Congresses have seen substantial efforts to enact risk reform legislation t...
The final paper from the symposium on public participation in Risk management discusses existing pr...
After discussing the increasing recognition of different kinds of claims for public participation in...
A discussion of the results of two surveys of present and past members of Food and Drug Administrati...
In prior studies by high-level commissions, emphasis was given to improving the scientific basis and...
In both academic and legislative circles, risk assessment reform is currently a hot topic. In the la...
Meaningful public participation has been perceived as difficult to accommodate in regulatory proceed...
Dread risks draw significant public attention in both the administrative process and the courts. Yet...
Recently, accrediting bodies are placing great responsibility for accountability on universities and...
Professor Shrader-Frechette maintains that a rigid distinction between risk assessment and risk mana...
Each year, federal regulatory agencies create thousands of new rules that affect the economy. When t...
While most consumers may know about the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and what it is suppo...
I have a slightly different subtitle for our session today, which I hope our panelists may consider ...
In the United States, the risk assessment − risk management paradigm that underpins federal decision...
An introduction to the legal framework within which employees of the twigs on our fourth branch of...
The past three or more Congresses have seen substantial efforts to enact risk reform legislation t...
The final paper from the symposium on public participation in Risk management discusses existing pr...
After discussing the increasing recognition of different kinds of claims for public participation in...
A discussion of the results of two surveys of present and past members of Food and Drug Administrati...
In prior studies by high-level commissions, emphasis was given to improving the scientific basis and...
In both academic and legislative circles, risk assessment reform is currently a hot topic. In the la...
Meaningful public participation has been perceived as difficult to accommodate in regulatory proceed...
Dread risks draw significant public attention in both the administrative process and the courts. Yet...
Recently, accrediting bodies are placing great responsibility for accountability on universities and...
Professor Shrader-Frechette maintains that a rigid distinction between risk assessment and risk mana...
Each year, federal regulatory agencies create thousands of new rules that affect the economy. When t...
While most consumers may know about the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and what it is suppo...
I have a slightly different subtitle for our session today, which I hope our panelists may consider ...
In the United States, the risk assessment − risk management paradigm that underpins federal decision...
An introduction to the legal framework within which employees of the twigs on our fourth branch of...
The past three or more Congresses have seen substantial efforts to enact risk reform legislation t...