Add to ORKGThe authors argue that Risk assessors belong to a profession and offer an alternative to the 1983 National Research Council model defining Risk assessment. They support and illustrate their model by reexamining three familiar Risk assessments: ethylene dibromide, WASH 1400, and Ice Minus Bacteria
This article is one piece in a series of articles that reflect on advances in ideas about risk made ...
The author describes what she calls the Expert-Judgment Strategy , finding that, because it discoun...
Dr. Paustenbach reviews the scientific underpinnings of about twenty years of health risk assessment...
When it comes to risks – health and environmental risks, like those linked to the use of nanotechnol...
The contribution of social sciences to risk assessment has often been confined to dimensions of risk...
The authors suggest that giving different individuals the responsibility for assessing and managing ...
Professor Shrader-Frechette maintains that a rigid distinction between risk assessment and risk mana...
Regulation of toxic substances is an extremely complex, uncertain, and controversial enterprise. The...
The functional separation of risk assessment and risk management has long been at the heart of risk ...
This brief commentary will argue that whether hormesis is considered in regulatory risk assessment i...
In 1983, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) published a seminal report, Risk Assessment in the F...
Table of contents for the journal Risk: Issues in Health & Safety (ISSN: 1073-8673
This Article examines and critiques pending Congressional proposals for the way we manage risk and f...
This article examines the use of epidemiology to evaluate Risks posed by toxic substances. Using ill...
Index for Volume One (1990) of the peer-reviewed journal Risk: Issues in Health & Safety
This article is one piece in a series of articles that reflect on advances in ideas about risk made ...
The author describes what she calls the Expert-Judgment Strategy , finding that, because it discoun...
Dr. Paustenbach reviews the scientific underpinnings of about twenty years of health risk assessment...
When it comes to risks – health and environmental risks, like those linked to the use of nanotechnol...
The contribution of social sciences to risk assessment has often been confined to dimensions of risk...
The authors suggest that giving different individuals the responsibility for assessing and managing ...
Professor Shrader-Frechette maintains that a rigid distinction between risk assessment and risk mana...
Regulation of toxic substances is an extremely complex, uncertain, and controversial enterprise. The...
The functional separation of risk assessment and risk management has long been at the heart of risk ...
This brief commentary will argue that whether hormesis is considered in regulatory risk assessment i...
In 1983, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) published a seminal report, Risk Assessment in the F...
Table of contents for the journal Risk: Issues in Health & Safety (ISSN: 1073-8673
This Article examines and critiques pending Congressional proposals for the way we manage risk and f...
This article examines the use of epidemiology to evaluate Risks posed by toxic substances. Using ill...
Index for Volume One (1990) of the peer-reviewed journal Risk: Issues in Health & Safety
This article is one piece in a series of articles that reflect on advances in ideas about risk made ...
The author describes what she calls the Expert-Judgment Strategy , finding that, because it discoun...
Dr. Paustenbach reviews the scientific underpinnings of about twenty years of health risk assessment...