Add to ORKGA close observer identifies the Science Court concept as inspiring consensus development conferences at the National Institutes of Health and describes the extent to which they have followed the model. Professor Jacoby also argues that, if the model were more closely followed, conference objectives would be better realized
OBJECTIVES: Formal consensus development methods are ways of obtaining and synthesising views of exp...
National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus and state-of-the-science statements are prepared by in...
This paper analyzes the potential for science courts to address the social need to regulate human ca...
Abstract. The purpose of this evaluation study is to identify problems and suggest modifications in ...
Dr. Jacoby explains why emerging technologies must be evaluated expeditiously. He also argues that a...
This research study offers a critical assessment of NIH\u27s Consensus Development Program (CDP), fo...
Program of events and list of registered attendees for the October 6, 1994 conference Which Scientis...
A self-described agnostic on the merits of the Science Court proposal describes how he independent...
Background: key decisions have to be made in healthcare systems and policies often under uncertain c...
A pair of consensus development conferences held in the United States and in Sweden presented an unu...
A critical examination of a policy designed to encourage commercial exploitation of federally funded...
According to an estimate by the Institute of Medicine made over a decade ago, treatment errors in ho...
[Excerpt] The frequency and magnitude of risks and benefits are facts. The acceptability of risks a...
The father of the Science Court describes his objective in proposing the institution as it has com...
In this paper, I argue that Miriam Solomon fails to show that medical consensus conferences, as orga...
OBJECTIVES: Formal consensus development methods are ways of obtaining and synthesising views of exp...
National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus and state-of-the-science statements are prepared by in...
This paper analyzes the potential for science courts to address the social need to regulate human ca...
Abstract. The purpose of this evaluation study is to identify problems and suggest modifications in ...
Dr. Jacoby explains why emerging technologies must be evaluated expeditiously. He also argues that a...
This research study offers a critical assessment of NIH\u27s Consensus Development Program (CDP), fo...
Program of events and list of registered attendees for the October 6, 1994 conference Which Scientis...
A self-described agnostic on the merits of the Science Court proposal describes how he independent...
Background: key decisions have to be made in healthcare systems and policies often under uncertain c...
A pair of consensus development conferences held in the United States and in Sweden presented an unu...
A critical examination of a policy designed to encourage commercial exploitation of federally funded...
According to an estimate by the Institute of Medicine made over a decade ago, treatment errors in ho...
[Excerpt] The frequency and magnitude of risks and benefits are facts. The acceptability of risks a...
The father of the Science Court describes his objective in proposing the institution as it has com...
In this paper, I argue that Miriam Solomon fails to show that medical consensus conferences, as orga...
OBJECTIVES: Formal consensus development methods are ways of obtaining and synthesising views of exp...
National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus and state-of-the-science statements are prepared by in...
This paper analyzes the potential for science courts to address the social need to regulate human ca...