Add to ORKGCalifornia Government Code section 53066.1 as recently amended gives cable television operators the right to obtain rate increases even in the face of the city or county franchisor opposition. Since most cable franchise agreements allow the franchisor to control rates for the cable service, there is a conflict between the statute and the franchise contracts. This article examines the issue of whether the statute violates the constitutional provisions against the impairment of contracts and whether the franchisor or a subscriber of the service has the necessary standing to assert the constitutional argument
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
Public concern over cable television\u27s status as a monopoly has generated a movement to allow loc...
As cable television develops into a communications medium capable of providing a vast array of voice...
Under the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the Cable Act), municipal regulation of rates for...
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stunned the cable television industry with its decis...
This comment will reveal the limited application of the Capital Cities\u27 decision with a discussio...
The cable television industry has received seemingly inconsistent treatment from the Federal Communi...
In many communities across the nation cable subscribers depend on government-owned cable television ...
Includes bibliographical references (pages 108-123)This study analyzed the contents of the local ord...
In October, 1992, Congress responded to consumer complaints about cable rates and services by passin...
The right to construct a cable system has usually been granted to a sole franchisee based on competi...
The Federal Communications Commission\u27s enabling statute, the Communications Act of 1934, provide...
In awarding and regulating cable franchises, cities often extract from cable operators promises and ...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
Public concern over cable television\u27s status as a monopoly has generated a movement to allow loc...
As cable television develops into a communications medium capable of providing a vast array of voice...
Under the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the Cable Act), municipal regulation of rates for...
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stunned the cable television industry with its decis...
This comment will reveal the limited application of the Capital Cities\u27 decision with a discussio...
The cable television industry has received seemingly inconsistent treatment from the Federal Communi...
In many communities across the nation cable subscribers depend on government-owned cable television ...
Includes bibliographical references (pages 108-123)This study analyzed the contents of the local ord...
In October, 1992, Congress responded to consumer complaints about cable rates and services by passin...
The right to construct a cable system has usually been granted to a sole franchisee based on competi...
The Federal Communications Commission\u27s enabling statute, the Communications Act of 1934, provide...
In awarding and regulating cable franchises, cities often extract from cable operators promises and ...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...