This article applies Alvin Plantinga’s principle that self-defeat is inherent in any theory which gives the theorist reason to doubt her own cognitive faculties to Kant’s theory of perception, transcendental idealism. Because transcendental idealism excludes the possibility of knowledge about things in themselves, including the transcendental idealist’s own cognitive faculties, the theory is self-defeating under Plantinga’s argument. The article continues by arguing that Kant’s appeal to God as a way to vindicate the transcendental idealist’s cognitive faculties is problematic in several ways, and that the theory therefore cannot avoid self-defeat
Should we be impressed by Plantinga’s radical take on episteme warrant? Not really. The author of th...
This article criticises Alvin Plantinga's claim that basic design beliefs, which arise without a con...
In this paper I defend the view that knowledge is belief for reasons that are both objectively and s...
In his recent book Warranted Christian Belief (2000), Alvin Plantinga argues that the defender of na...
Alvin Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism argues that given the story of biological...
I argue that Kant’s primary epistemological concern in the Critique of Pure Reason’s transcendental ...
This article concerns Quentin Meillassoux’s claim that Kant’s revolution is responsible for philosop...
Alvin Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism (EAAN) begins with the following simple i...
True beliefs are better guides to the world than false ones. This is the commonsense assumption that...
Abstract: During the past two decades, Alvin Plantinga has formulated an argument against naturalism...
This paper reconstructs and defends Kant's argument for the transcendental status of reason's princi...
In this article we intend to present Alvin Plantinga’s epistemology by showing the way in which its ...
Kant’s transcendental idealism is severally described as an ‘immanetist’ and ‘agnostic’ one. Couched...
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2014v18n3p361 In this paper I present a proposal to reformulate...
This paper will focus on Kant’s ideas of cognition. The first part of the paper will be a kind of gl...
Should we be impressed by Plantinga’s radical take on episteme warrant? Not really. The author of th...
This article criticises Alvin Plantinga's claim that basic design beliefs, which arise without a con...
In this paper I defend the view that knowledge is belief for reasons that are both objectively and s...
In his recent book Warranted Christian Belief (2000), Alvin Plantinga argues that the defender of na...
Alvin Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism argues that given the story of biological...
I argue that Kant’s primary epistemological concern in the Critique of Pure Reason’s transcendental ...
This article concerns Quentin Meillassoux’s claim that Kant’s revolution is responsible for philosop...
Alvin Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism (EAAN) begins with the following simple i...
True beliefs are better guides to the world than false ones. This is the commonsense assumption that...
Abstract: During the past two decades, Alvin Plantinga has formulated an argument against naturalism...
This paper reconstructs and defends Kant's argument for the transcendental status of reason's princi...
In this article we intend to present Alvin Plantinga’s epistemology by showing the way in which its ...
Kant’s transcendental idealism is severally described as an ‘immanetist’ and ‘agnostic’ one. Couched...
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2014v18n3p361 In this paper I present a proposal to reformulate...
This paper will focus on Kant’s ideas of cognition. The first part of the paper will be a kind of gl...
Should we be impressed by Plantinga’s radical take on episteme warrant? Not really. The author of th...
This article criticises Alvin Plantinga's claim that basic design beliefs, which arise without a con...
In this paper I defend the view that knowledge is belief for reasons that are both objectively and s...