A Typology of Oppositional Knowledge: Democracy and the U.S. Peace Movement

Institutionally privileged political discourses not only legitimate the policy agendas of power-holders, but also de-legitimate dissent. Oppositional discourses are social movement responses to these cultural obstacles to mass mobilization. Integrating discourse analysis and framing theory, we argue that the production of oppositional knowledge constitutes a long-term, counter-hegemonic project that connects macro-level discourses with meso and micro-level efforts at political persuasion, mobilization, and change. Drawing examples from statements issued by U.S. peace movement organizations (PMOs) over fifteen years, we map the production of oppositional discourses across five conflict periods. Using qualitative data analysis and both inductive and deductive theorizing, we develop a typology of the U.S. peace movement\'s discourses on democracy. We show that four forms of oppositional knowledge were generated by PMOs to facilitate policy dialogue and accountability. Through their statements, peace movement organizations crafted a shared conception of democracy that is antithetical to military intervention abroad and political repression at home.Discourse, Peace and Social Movements, War, Hegemony, Democracy, Symbolic Culture, Political Persuasion