This project responds to a need for new theoretical tools for understanding law as a site for the intersection of rhetoric and philosophy. In advancing the concept of “models of judgment” as a meta-theoretical approach to the philosophical rhetoric of jurisprudence, I argue that it provides a unique perspective on the rhetorical commitments undergirding prominent judicial theories. Paragons of good judgment crafted by Richard Posner, Martha Nussbaum, and Cass Sunstein are examined, foregrounding their rhetorical character and function
In this article I build on arguments developed in recent work and elaborate on my thesis that it is ...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
Rhetorical scholars have long advocated for the study of legal discourse because of the “centrality ...
This essay celebrates judicial instigators, and Judge Richard Posner as instigator. It embraces a vi...
In Rethinking Legal Pragmatism: A Philosophical Approach, I take issue with the position of Judge ...
The process by which we represent our society\u27s will and welfare in the medium of law is an imagi...
This Forum consists of four Essays which explore and analyze the rhetoric used in the Lochner opinio...
The Irrelevance of Contemporary Academic Philosophy for Law: Recovering the Rhetorical Tradition, in...
This book describes the significance of rhetorical knowledge for law through detailed discussions of...
Throughout most modern and contemporary legal scholarship there appears an unbridgeable division bet...
An approach commonly used to teach argument in English departments tacitly dichotomizes argument and...
Legal theory has failed to fully explore the rhetorical in the judicial decision and, in doing so, h...
Judgment is simple, right? This book begs to differ. Written for all students of the law—from underg...
An open-handed image of rhetoric presents an argument against the closed fist of logic and the “nast...
In this paper I shall suggest that law is most usefully seen not, as it usually is by academics and ...
In this article I build on arguments developed in recent work and elaborate on my thesis that it is ...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
Rhetorical scholars have long advocated for the study of legal discourse because of the “centrality ...
This essay celebrates judicial instigators, and Judge Richard Posner as instigator. It embraces a vi...
In Rethinking Legal Pragmatism: A Philosophical Approach, I take issue with the position of Judge ...
The process by which we represent our society\u27s will and welfare in the medium of law is an imagi...
This Forum consists of four Essays which explore and analyze the rhetoric used in the Lochner opinio...
The Irrelevance of Contemporary Academic Philosophy for Law: Recovering the Rhetorical Tradition, in...
This book describes the significance of rhetorical knowledge for law through detailed discussions of...
Throughout most modern and contemporary legal scholarship there appears an unbridgeable division bet...
An approach commonly used to teach argument in English departments tacitly dichotomizes argument and...
Legal theory has failed to fully explore the rhetorical in the judicial decision and, in doing so, h...
Judgment is simple, right? This book begs to differ. Written for all students of the law—from underg...
An open-handed image of rhetoric presents an argument against the closed fist of logic and the “nast...
In this paper I shall suggest that law is most usefully seen not, as it usually is by academics and ...
In this article I build on arguments developed in recent work and elaborate on my thesis that it is ...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
Rhetorical scholars have long advocated for the study of legal discourse because of the “centrality ...