The appeal has been treated by academics as a mere legal procedure, possessing no particular significance. Indeed, for many years, legal scholars accepted the influential arguments of Professors Julius Goebel and Roscoe Pound that the appearance of the appeal in early American courts arose either from confusion about English common law legal procedures or was the result of colonial adaptation of English justice-of-the-peace practices. Professor Bilder challenges this conventional explanation of the origin of the appeal by locating the early American colonists within a transatlantic Western European legal culture. Professor Bilder\u27s Article draws on recent work in cultural history to propose the idea of a culture of appeal in early Amer...
Between the later seventeenth century and American independence, appeals from colonial high courts w...
In 1786, legal reform activist Benjamin Austin undertook a campaign to promote the use of arbitratio...
The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial po...
The appeal has been treated by academics as a mere legal procedure, possessing no particular signifi...
For the past two centuries, the colonial appeals to the Privy Council fell between the cracks on bot...
This introductory text explores the historical origins of the main legal institutions that came to c...
Historical interest in popular constitutionalism has enlivened the search for the origins of judicia...
Departing from traditional approaches to colonial legal history, Mary Sarah Bilder argues that Ameri...
It seems fair to assume that the first American colonists took with them attitudes and practices fro...
What we now call judicial review in the United States became part of the American constitutional sys...
Fundamental Rights Law is a ubiquitous feature of modern American jurisprudence. Where did the term ...
In this swiftly moving age, with its revolutionary advances in so many diverse fields of activity, i...
Article looks at a historical problem—the first use of case law by English royal justices in the thi...
The three articles offered in this forum on the early history of criminal appeals do us the great se...
Article III of the Constitution provides that the judicial Power of the United States extends to a...
Between the later seventeenth century and American independence, appeals from colonial high courts w...
In 1786, legal reform activist Benjamin Austin undertook a campaign to promote the use of arbitratio...
The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial po...
The appeal has been treated by academics as a mere legal procedure, possessing no particular signifi...
For the past two centuries, the colonial appeals to the Privy Council fell between the cracks on bot...
This introductory text explores the historical origins of the main legal institutions that came to c...
Historical interest in popular constitutionalism has enlivened the search for the origins of judicia...
Departing from traditional approaches to colonial legal history, Mary Sarah Bilder argues that Ameri...
It seems fair to assume that the first American colonists took with them attitudes and practices fro...
What we now call judicial review in the United States became part of the American constitutional sys...
Fundamental Rights Law is a ubiquitous feature of modern American jurisprudence. Where did the term ...
In this swiftly moving age, with its revolutionary advances in so many diverse fields of activity, i...
Article looks at a historical problem—the first use of case law by English royal justices in the thi...
The three articles offered in this forum on the early history of criminal appeals do us the great se...
Article III of the Constitution provides that the judicial Power of the United States extends to a...
Between the later seventeenth century and American independence, appeals from colonial high courts w...
In 1786, legal reform activist Benjamin Austin undertook a campaign to promote the use of arbitratio...
The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial po...