For any given rule, there are infinite interpretations. Yet law and interpretation are inseparable. Interpretation is a complex process, based on murky forces, exposed to some extent in institutions, habits and conventions, which are often poorly understood even by the person charged with the act of interpreting. The article deconstructs—through a series of improvisations on logic, reason, rules, duty, desire, repetition, enchantment, symptom and sin—the dream of interpreting law. Drawing on Wittgenstein, Freud, Kant, Foucault and others from the pantheon of modernism, the article ruminates on the endless prospect of interpretation and the possibility of discord
How should we interpret legal instruments? How do we identify the law they create? Current approache...
Among other achievements, the modern law-as-literature movement has prompted increasing numbers of l...
Interpretation is a fundamental feature of legal practice. Yet, we have no complete account of inter...
For any given rule, there are infinite interpretations. Yet law and interpretation are inseparable. ...
Interpretation is fashionable, and not just in jurisprudence. Yet for all the attention interpretati...
In this chapter from Law and the Humanities: An Introduction, published by Cambridge University Pr...
This Article situates the field of law within the interpretive disciplines and analyzes a number of ...
In Legal Interpretation, Kent Greenawalt focuses on the complex and multi-faceted topic of textual i...
Some people believe that the very idea of interpretation requires judges to adopt a particular metho...
This essay argues that Intentionalism\u27s definition of interpretation entails nothing about the le...
Book review of Interpretation and Legal Theory by Andrei Marmor and published by Clarendon Press (Ox...
This essay concerns the possibility of interpreting law. It is always possible to interpret law in t...
Professor Alexander provides a brief introduction to the 2004 Editors\u27 Symposium titled What is ...
In this paper I outline a comprehensive theory of legal interpretation based on an assumption that l...
Legal semiotics emphasizes the contingency and fluidity of legal concepts and stresses the existence...
How should we interpret legal instruments? How do we identify the law they create? Current approache...
Among other achievements, the modern law-as-literature movement has prompted increasing numbers of l...
Interpretation is a fundamental feature of legal practice. Yet, we have no complete account of inter...
For any given rule, there are infinite interpretations. Yet law and interpretation are inseparable. ...
Interpretation is fashionable, and not just in jurisprudence. Yet for all the attention interpretati...
In this chapter from Law and the Humanities: An Introduction, published by Cambridge University Pr...
This Article situates the field of law within the interpretive disciplines and analyzes a number of ...
In Legal Interpretation, Kent Greenawalt focuses on the complex and multi-faceted topic of textual i...
Some people believe that the very idea of interpretation requires judges to adopt a particular metho...
This essay argues that Intentionalism\u27s definition of interpretation entails nothing about the le...
Book review of Interpretation and Legal Theory by Andrei Marmor and published by Clarendon Press (Ox...
This essay concerns the possibility of interpreting law. It is always possible to interpret law in t...
Professor Alexander provides a brief introduction to the 2004 Editors\u27 Symposium titled What is ...
In this paper I outline a comprehensive theory of legal interpretation based on an assumption that l...
Legal semiotics emphasizes the contingency and fluidity of legal concepts and stresses the existence...
How should we interpret legal instruments? How do we identify the law they create? Current approache...
Among other achievements, the modern law-as-literature movement has prompted increasing numbers of l...
Interpretation is a fundamental feature of legal practice. Yet, we have no complete account of inter...