On July 9, 2013, in Brown v. United Airlines, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the Airline Deregulation Act (“ADA”) preempted skycaps’ common law tortious interference and unjust enrichment claims. In so holding, the First Circuit articulated a two-pronged test in an attempt to provide clarity to the relationship between the savings clause and the preemption clause of the ADA. This Comment argues that the First Circuit’s two-pronged test is faithful to U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence and should serve as a model for other federal appeals courts until the Supreme Court provides additional guidance
June 1980Lecture delivered June 19, 1980, by Robert Reed Gray, Esq. to the "Air Transportation -- Ma...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent arbitration law decisions reflect the Court\u27s strong support for ar...
Recently, in Arthur Anderson LLP v. Carlisle, the Supreme Court resolved a split between the circuit...
On July 9, 2013, in Brown v. United Airlines, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ...
The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA) deregulated the domestic airline industry. Specifically, ...
Whether claims of negligence or product liability are preempted by the Federal Aviation Act currentl...
Article 17 of both the Montreal Convention and its predecessor, the Warsaw Convention, imposes liabi...
This Note will analyze the language of the United Airlines II decision, in light of Barnett, Seventh...
In Summers v. State Street Bank & Trust Company, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh ...
This Comment begins by walking through the current conflict of laws system in the United States and ...
AS THE CHAIRMAN of the the United States\u27 Senate Subcommittee on Administrative Practice, I have ...
One of the primary challenges facing the American aviation industry is the issue of federal preempti...
The following article provides an overview of recent, important developments in aviation law from Fe...
The United States is one of the few nations where private airline ownership and more than one carrie...
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant delays and cancellation of airline tickets without...
June 1980Lecture delivered June 19, 1980, by Robert Reed Gray, Esq. to the "Air Transportation -- Ma...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent arbitration law decisions reflect the Court\u27s strong support for ar...
Recently, in Arthur Anderson LLP v. Carlisle, the Supreme Court resolved a split between the circuit...
On July 9, 2013, in Brown v. United Airlines, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ...
The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA) deregulated the domestic airline industry. Specifically, ...
Whether claims of negligence or product liability are preempted by the Federal Aviation Act currentl...
Article 17 of both the Montreal Convention and its predecessor, the Warsaw Convention, imposes liabi...
This Note will analyze the language of the United Airlines II decision, in light of Barnett, Seventh...
In Summers v. State Street Bank & Trust Company, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh ...
This Comment begins by walking through the current conflict of laws system in the United States and ...
AS THE CHAIRMAN of the the United States\u27 Senate Subcommittee on Administrative Practice, I have ...
One of the primary challenges facing the American aviation industry is the issue of federal preempti...
The following article provides an overview of recent, important developments in aviation law from Fe...
The United States is one of the few nations where private airline ownership and more than one carrie...
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant delays and cancellation of airline tickets without...
June 1980Lecture delivered June 19, 1980, by Robert Reed Gray, Esq. to the "Air Transportation -- Ma...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent arbitration law decisions reflect the Court\u27s strong support for ar...
Recently, in Arthur Anderson LLP v. Carlisle, the Supreme Court resolved a split between the circuit...