Uniform Commercial Code Article 4 governs both a bank’s duties in collecting checks for payment as well as its duties to its depositors. Section 4-401 provides that a bank can charge an item to a customer’s account only if it is properly payable. For an item to be properly payable, it must be authorized by the customer. This Note examines the 2010 case, Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Wachovia Bank, in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota stated that a bank can vary section 4-401’s default rule by including negotiated provisions in the deposit agreement. After exploring the structure and history of Article 4, this Note argues that banks should not be able to vary section 4-401’s default rule, and proposes that courts take...
A depositor in the defendant bank was a large firm with a payroll clerk who prepared the employees\u...
Plaintiff\u27s bookkeeper, who, as defendant bank admittedly knew, had authority only to indorse and...
The purpose of this Article is to evaluate the efficacy of the fraud exception to the independence p...
Uniform Commercial Code Article 4 governs both a bank’s duties in collecting checks for payment as w...
In addressing the dual issues of check forgeries and alteration claims faced by many banks, the Un...
Common law negligence claims persist in check fraud cases despite the Uniform Commercial Code’s loss...
As written, the new section 4-205(2) Payment/Deposit Warranty may provide a new theory upon which to...
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 4-303 addresses two areas where the UCC and the Bankruptcy Code in...
This article evaluates the potential effect of this tort on the bank andits customer where the impro...
Obvious examples include inequities in our criminal justice system and in school funding. Much has b...
This Note argues that where a bank reasonably should have known of a fraud but still pays out a wire...
The checking account is a legal arrangement between a bank and its customer in which the bank promis...
Malphrus v. Home Savings Bank, 44 Misc. 2d 705, 254 N.Y.S.2d 980 (Albany County Ct. 1965)
This article analyzes two actions in 2017 and 2018, respectively, by the Board of Governors of the F...
My task was to prepare a short article dealing in some depth with specific problems which have arise...
A depositor in the defendant bank was a large firm with a payroll clerk who prepared the employees\u...
Plaintiff\u27s bookkeeper, who, as defendant bank admittedly knew, had authority only to indorse and...
The purpose of this Article is to evaluate the efficacy of the fraud exception to the independence p...
Uniform Commercial Code Article 4 governs both a bank’s duties in collecting checks for payment as w...
In addressing the dual issues of check forgeries and alteration claims faced by many banks, the Un...
Common law negligence claims persist in check fraud cases despite the Uniform Commercial Code’s loss...
As written, the new section 4-205(2) Payment/Deposit Warranty may provide a new theory upon which to...
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 4-303 addresses two areas where the UCC and the Bankruptcy Code in...
This article evaluates the potential effect of this tort on the bank andits customer where the impro...
Obvious examples include inequities in our criminal justice system and in school funding. Much has b...
This Note argues that where a bank reasonably should have known of a fraud but still pays out a wire...
The checking account is a legal arrangement between a bank and its customer in which the bank promis...
Malphrus v. Home Savings Bank, 44 Misc. 2d 705, 254 N.Y.S.2d 980 (Albany County Ct. 1965)
This article analyzes two actions in 2017 and 2018, respectively, by the Board of Governors of the F...
My task was to prepare a short article dealing in some depth with specific problems which have arise...
A depositor in the defendant bank was a large firm with a payroll clerk who prepared the employees\u...
Plaintiff\u27s bookkeeper, who, as defendant bank admittedly knew, had authority only to indorse and...
The purpose of this Article is to evaluate the efficacy of the fraud exception to the independence p...