As is well known, the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court appears to be re-defining its approach to the commerce clause: limits on federal power again are being enunciated. However, the debate on this issue in the United States is taking place without any significant consideration of the comparative law on the subject from Canada and Australia, which have similar clauses in their constitutions. As this Article shows, Canadian and Australian law confirm that the approach of the Supreme Court majority is preferable to that of the minority. Furthermore, the minority\u27s fear that drawing boundaries may prove impossible is shown, by consideration of the experience of Canada and Australia, to be exaggerated
In a 9-0 decision handed down in 2000, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts selective purch...
This article examines the extent and nature of the use of foreign law in constitutional adjudication...
Many states have enacted constitutions that are influenced by the U.S. Constitution, and foreign cou...
Recent decisions have revealed a growing rift in the Supreme Court on the question of the effect of ...
The ongoing expansion of federal criminal law undermines the historical decentralization of criminal...
The Senate hearings considering Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court nomination called new attention to the C...
In this article, I explore the Supreme Court\u27s new definition of Commerce ... among the several ...
This essay, a contribution to a fall symposium at the Oklahoma City University law school, examines ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has on numerous occasions addressed the constitutionality of state taxes unde...
The U.S. Supreme Court\u27s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 132...
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and fore...
Throughout its history, the constitutional basis of the FLSA has remained anchored in the Commerce C...
This Article seeks to refute Rosenkranz’s argument that courts should limit their adjudication of ch...
This paper examines the use of comparative law by the Supreme Court of Canada in its 2008 constituti...
In the historic case of M\u27Culloch v. Maryland, CHIEF Justice Marshall said, referring to the Fede...
In a 9-0 decision handed down in 2000, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts selective purch...
This article examines the extent and nature of the use of foreign law in constitutional adjudication...
Many states have enacted constitutions that are influenced by the U.S. Constitution, and foreign cou...
Recent decisions have revealed a growing rift in the Supreme Court on the question of the effect of ...
The ongoing expansion of federal criminal law undermines the historical decentralization of criminal...
The Senate hearings considering Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court nomination called new attention to the C...
In this article, I explore the Supreme Court\u27s new definition of Commerce ... among the several ...
This essay, a contribution to a fall symposium at the Oklahoma City University law school, examines ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has on numerous occasions addressed the constitutionality of state taxes unde...
The U.S. Supreme Court\u27s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 132...
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and fore...
Throughout its history, the constitutional basis of the FLSA has remained anchored in the Commerce C...
This Article seeks to refute Rosenkranz’s argument that courts should limit their adjudication of ch...
This paper examines the use of comparative law by the Supreme Court of Canada in its 2008 constituti...
In the historic case of M\u27Culloch v. Maryland, CHIEF Justice Marshall said, referring to the Fede...
In a 9-0 decision handed down in 2000, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts selective purch...
This article examines the extent and nature of the use of foreign law in constitutional adjudication...
Many states have enacted constitutions that are influenced by the U.S. Constitution, and foreign cou...