A program is proposed for the innovation, development, and demonstration of technologies necessary to decommission the Hanford radiochemical plant area to the extent that the sites can have unrestricted public access. The five tasks selected for development and demonstration of restoration techniques were restoration of a burial ground, decommissioning of a separations plant, restoration of a separations plant waste interim storage tank farm, restoration of a liquid disposal area, and disposal of large contaminated equipment. Process development requirements are tabulated and discussed. A proposed schedule and estimated costs are given. (JSR
The Deactivation and Decommissioning Focus Area’s (DDFA’s) mission is to develop, demonstrate, and d...
In 1942 Hanford was commissioned as a site for the production of weapons-grade plutonium. The years ...
The Hanford Site and the Savannah River Site (SRS) were the primary plutonium production facilities ...
The 570-square mile Hanford Project contains facilities with varying degrees of radioactive contamin...
Remote system technologies are being deployed by Fluor Hanford to help accelerate the deactivation o...
The process of decommissioning a facility such as a nuclear reactor or reprocessing plant presents m...
The United States Department of Energy (DOE) continually seeks safer and more cost effective technol...
At the end of World War II, the demand for more production along with process and military surveilla...
Decommissioning and remediation activities are subject to some common driving forces that influence ...
The deactivated 233-S Plutonium Concentration Facility, located in the 200 Area at the Hanford Site,...
The Fission Product Pilot Plant (FPPP) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was one of the fi...
This paper describes the deactivation and source term reduction activities conducted over the recent...
This report was prepared by Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) with technical and cost estimating su...
The aging of research reactors worldwide has resulted in a heightened awareness in the international...
The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s), Office of River Protection (ORP) located at Hanford Washing...
The Deactivation and Decommissioning Focus Area’s (DDFA’s) mission is to develop, demonstrate, and d...
In 1942 Hanford was commissioned as a site for the production of weapons-grade plutonium. The years ...
The Hanford Site and the Savannah River Site (SRS) were the primary plutonium production facilities ...
The 570-square mile Hanford Project contains facilities with varying degrees of radioactive contamin...
Remote system technologies are being deployed by Fluor Hanford to help accelerate the deactivation o...
The process of decommissioning a facility such as a nuclear reactor or reprocessing plant presents m...
The United States Department of Energy (DOE) continually seeks safer and more cost effective technol...
At the end of World War II, the demand for more production along with process and military surveilla...
Decommissioning and remediation activities are subject to some common driving forces that influence ...
The deactivated 233-S Plutonium Concentration Facility, located in the 200 Area at the Hanford Site,...
The Fission Product Pilot Plant (FPPP) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was one of the fi...
This paper describes the deactivation and source term reduction activities conducted over the recent...
This report was prepared by Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) with technical and cost estimating su...
The aging of research reactors worldwide has resulted in a heightened awareness in the international...
The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s), Office of River Protection (ORP) located at Hanford Washing...
The Deactivation and Decommissioning Focus Area’s (DDFA’s) mission is to develop, demonstrate, and d...
In 1942 Hanford was commissioned as a site for the production of weapons-grade plutonium. The years ...
The Hanford Site and the Savannah River Site (SRS) were the primary plutonium production facilities ...