We comment on the calculational mistake in the paper 'Modeling galaxy halos using dark matter with pressure' by Somnath Bharadwaj and Sayan Kar. The authors made a mistake while calculating the metric, which led to an overestimate of the deflection angle of light passing through the halos for -1 < w{sub r} < -0.5 and an underestimate of the deflection angle for -0.5 < w{sub r} < 0. In addition, the solution for w{sub r} > 0 should not exist. Although the Bharadwaj-Kar solution should be corrected, it appears that the characteristics of the deflection angle under the supposed nonconventional, nonideal fluid equation of state for the dark matter halo remain sensitive to the impact parameter and may be verifiable through observa...
The limits of available computing power have forced models for the structure of stellar halos to ado...
We compare the dark matter halos’ structural parameters derived for four Milky Way dwarf spheroidal ...
Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132) have raised several issues in their Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev....
We correct two errors that were present in the former version of this paper. First, a factor $1/3$ ...
The paper 'The bias of DLAs at z ~ 2.3: evidence for very strong stellar feedback in shallow potenti...
We determine the error introduced in a joint halo model analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy...
In a recent Letter (astro-ph/9605001), Cowsik et al. claim that the best fit value of the velocity d...
Let us first respond to the Comments by Gates et al. (GKT) [1] in our Letter [2]. Among the various ...
Natarajan A, Schwarz D. Erratum: Effect of early dark matter halos on reionization [Phys. Rev. D 78,...
In a recent Letter (astro-ph/9605001), Cowsik et al. claim that a self-consistent treatment of the d...
We compare the dark matter halos’ structural parameters derived for four Milky Way dwarf spheroidal ...
A Comment on the Letter by R. Cowsiki Charu Ratnam, and P. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3886 ...
According to the current concordance cosmological model, the dark matter (DM) particles are collisio...
In a recent Letter, Bhoonah et al. [1] attempted to derive limits on dark matter interactions with o...
This erratum corrects the following mistakes in our paper Particle Dark Matter Constraints: the Effe...
The limits of available computing power have forced models for the structure of stellar halos to ado...
We compare the dark matter halos’ structural parameters derived for four Milky Way dwarf spheroidal ...
Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132) have raised several issues in their Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev....
We correct two errors that were present in the former version of this paper. First, a factor $1/3$ ...
The paper 'The bias of DLAs at z ~ 2.3: evidence for very strong stellar feedback in shallow potenti...
We determine the error introduced in a joint halo model analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy...
In a recent Letter (astro-ph/9605001), Cowsik et al. claim that the best fit value of the velocity d...
Let us first respond to the Comments by Gates et al. (GKT) [1] in our Letter [2]. Among the various ...
Natarajan A, Schwarz D. Erratum: Effect of early dark matter halos on reionization [Phys. Rev. D 78,...
In a recent Letter (astro-ph/9605001), Cowsik et al. claim that a self-consistent treatment of the d...
We compare the dark matter halos’ structural parameters derived for four Milky Way dwarf spheroidal ...
A Comment on the Letter by R. Cowsiki Charu Ratnam, and P. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3886 ...
According to the current concordance cosmological model, the dark matter (DM) particles are collisio...
In a recent Letter, Bhoonah et al. [1] attempted to derive limits on dark matter interactions with o...
This erratum corrects the following mistakes in our paper Particle Dark Matter Constraints: the Effe...
The limits of available computing power have forced models for the structure of stellar halos to ado...
We compare the dark matter halos’ structural parameters derived for four Milky Way dwarf spheroidal ...
Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132) have raised several issues in their Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev....