Add to ORKGIn 2015, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Young v. United Parcel Service. In the case, a\ud United Parcel Service (UPS) worker named Peggy Young challenged her employer’s refusal to grant her a light-duty work assignment while she was pregnant, claiming that UPS’s actions violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). This report begins with a discussion of the facts in the Young case, followed by an overview of the PDA. The report then provides an analysis of the Young case, its implications, and a potential legislative response
This project focuses on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 and its role in the history of equa...
As the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA) turns forty, it is time to consider how we define ...
As demonstrated in this Note, there is still a considerable way to go before women are no longer for...
The Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. outlined a new analytical fr...
For over twenty years, the federal courts of appeals have been divided over the extent to which the ...
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 can be interpreted in two obvious ways: one interpretation ...
On March 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc...
In deciding Young v. United Parcel Service, the Supreme Court has intervened in ongoing struggles ab...
On March 25, 2015, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Young v. UPS, Inc.—the most recent case in...
Professor Widiss\u27 contribution is the Judgment text of Chapter 3, Pregnancy Discrimination: Young...
The last forty years have seen the development of greater labor force attachments by both pregnant a...
Pregnant women sometimes ask employers for accommodations – such as being able to sit on a stool or ...
By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court just ruled in favor of Peggy Young, a UPS driver who claimed she...
Clearly the most significant case handed down during the 2015 survey period was the March 2015 decis...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on July 1, 2014, in the Fourth Circuit case of Young v. United ...
This project focuses on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 and its role in the history of equa...
As the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA) turns forty, it is time to consider how we define ...
As demonstrated in this Note, there is still a considerable way to go before women are no longer for...
The Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. outlined a new analytical fr...
For over twenty years, the federal courts of appeals have been divided over the extent to which the ...
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 can be interpreted in two obvious ways: one interpretation ...
On March 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc...
In deciding Young v. United Parcel Service, the Supreme Court has intervened in ongoing struggles ab...
On March 25, 2015, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Young v. UPS, Inc.—the most recent case in...
Professor Widiss\u27 contribution is the Judgment text of Chapter 3, Pregnancy Discrimination: Young...
The last forty years have seen the development of greater labor force attachments by both pregnant a...
Pregnant women sometimes ask employers for accommodations – such as being able to sit on a stool or ...
By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court just ruled in favor of Peggy Young, a UPS driver who claimed she...
Clearly the most significant case handed down during the 2015 survey period was the March 2015 decis...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on July 1, 2014, in the Fourth Circuit case of Young v. United ...
This project focuses on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 and its role in the history of equa...
As the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA) turns forty, it is time to consider how we define ...
As demonstrated in this Note, there is still a considerable way to go before women are no longer for...