A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO estimated the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) sugar program's: (1) costs to domestic sweetener users; (2) benefits to domestic sugar and high-fructose corn syrup producers; and (3) net effects on the U.S. economy--the differences between the costs to users and the benefits to producers that result from artificially high sweetener prices.
Studies have shown that public regulatory authorities can serve their selfinterest instead of the pu...
Abstract Studies have shown that public regulatory authorities can serve their self-interest inste...
This report discusses the federal sugar program, which authorized by the Federal Agriculture Improve...
We analyze the welfare cost of the U.S. sugar program, using a multimarket model of U.S. sweetener m...
We examine how US farm policies for sweetener crops have affected the consumption and composition of...
The United States has a long history of Government involvement in the sugar industry, first in 1789 ...
The sugar support program and rapid adoption of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) played important rol...
This report address considerations in the 1995 farm bill debate for sugar, including market conditio...
We analyze the various welfare costs, transfers, trade, and employment consequences of the current U...
Major changes in the use of US sweeteners have occurred since 1970, in both the amount and compositi...
Artificially Sweetened: An Analysis of the United States Sugar Program By limiting imports of sugar ...
Most of the major sugar producing and exporting countries, including the United States, have adopte...
Sugar growers continue to benefit from favorable economic conditions provided by the U.S. government...
Domestic US sugar production has been protected by government policy for the past 82 years, resultin...
Life-long farmer Thomas Jefferson prioritized agriculture in his presidential administration because...
Studies have shown that public regulatory authorities can serve their selfinterest instead of the pu...
Abstract Studies have shown that public regulatory authorities can serve their self-interest inste...
This report discusses the federal sugar program, which authorized by the Federal Agriculture Improve...
We analyze the welfare cost of the U.S. sugar program, using a multimarket model of U.S. sweetener m...
We examine how US farm policies for sweetener crops have affected the consumption and composition of...
The United States has a long history of Government involvement in the sugar industry, first in 1789 ...
The sugar support program and rapid adoption of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) played important rol...
This report address considerations in the 1995 farm bill debate for sugar, including market conditio...
We analyze the various welfare costs, transfers, trade, and employment consequences of the current U...
Major changes in the use of US sweeteners have occurred since 1970, in both the amount and compositi...
Artificially Sweetened: An Analysis of the United States Sugar Program By limiting imports of sugar ...
Most of the major sugar producing and exporting countries, including the United States, have adopte...
Sugar growers continue to benefit from favorable economic conditions provided by the U.S. government...
Domestic US sugar production has been protected by government policy for the past 82 years, resultin...
Life-long farmer Thomas Jefferson prioritized agriculture in his presidential administration because...
Studies have shown that public regulatory authorities can serve their selfinterest instead of the pu...
Abstract Studies have shown that public regulatory authorities can serve their self-interest inste...
This report discusses the federal sugar program, which authorized by the Federal Agriculture Improve...