The purposes of this report are to examine the Congress-court connection along several discrete, but overlapping, dimensions. First, the constitutional authority of Congress and the judiciary is summarized briefly. Second, the report highlights the court’s role as legislative-executive “umpire” and federal-state “referee” in our constitutional system. Third, the report discusses the court’s part in statutory interpretation as well as the diverse ways Congress may “check and balance” the judiciary. Fourth, the paper reviews several current controversies associated with the judicial nominations process. Fifth, the state of play with respect to the so-called “nuclear” or “constitutional” option for ending judicial filibusters is discussed alon...
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held ...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
This article adopts a novel separation of powers framework to analyze the Rehnquist Court\u27s recen...
Congress rarely participates in litigation about the meaning of federal law. By contrast, the execut...
Congress has many available tools to influence the federal judiciary. In this article, we consider C...
This symposium examines the authority of Congress to shape the jurisdictional boundaries and remedia...
This report provides an overview of the major issues which have been raised recently in the Senate r...
Recusal is one of the most hotly contested issues facing the Supreme Court. From the wide-ranging de...
In recent years, the fate of federal statutes has increasingly turned on the contents of their forma...
Over the past eight years, the Supreme Court has been unusually aggressive in its exercise ofjudicia...
This Article examines growing congressional interest in a specific legislative check on judicial pow...
In matters of oversight, Congress and the President have fundamentally incompatible views of their i...
It is well settled that independent courts play a vital role in promoting rule-of-law and separation...
The formal institutional ties between Congress and the Supreme Court are complex and interdependent....
This Essay presents an analysis of the Supreme Court Review Act, a bill that was recently introduced...
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held ...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
This article adopts a novel separation of powers framework to analyze the Rehnquist Court\u27s recen...
Congress rarely participates in litigation about the meaning of federal law. By contrast, the execut...
Congress has many available tools to influence the federal judiciary. In this article, we consider C...
This symposium examines the authority of Congress to shape the jurisdictional boundaries and remedia...
This report provides an overview of the major issues which have been raised recently in the Senate r...
Recusal is one of the most hotly contested issues facing the Supreme Court. From the wide-ranging de...
In recent years, the fate of federal statutes has increasingly turned on the contents of their forma...
Over the past eight years, the Supreme Court has been unusually aggressive in its exercise ofjudicia...
This Article examines growing congressional interest in a specific legislative check on judicial pow...
In matters of oversight, Congress and the President have fundamentally incompatible views of their i...
It is well settled that independent courts play a vital role in promoting rule-of-law and separation...
The formal institutional ties between Congress and the Supreme Court are complex and interdependent....
This Essay presents an analysis of the Supreme Court Review Act, a bill that was recently introduced...
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held ...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
This article adopts a novel separation of powers framework to analyze the Rehnquist Court\u27s recen...