This report illustrates the difference between the concepts of “monopoly” and “monopolization” by touching on the monopoly/monopolization thinking in the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), as illustrated in (1) statements on merger enforcement made by recent antitrust enforcement officials (generally indicative of the agencies’ concerns about competitive conditions and the effect of various market transactions), (2) the 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines 2 and (3) some observations on the Government actions against the Microsoft and Intel Corporations
This report, which may be updated to further reflect congressional action, attempts to provide the a...
This chapter addresses issues in antitrust economics that related to the exercise of market power by...
The antitrust laws of the United States have, from their inception, allowed firms to acquire signifi...
Monopolization, the restriction of competition by a dominant firm, is regulated in roughly half of t...
The divergence between the economic and legal concepts of monopoly and the consequences thereof have...
The prohibition of certain types of anticompetitive unilateral conduct by firms possessing a substan...
Attempt to monopolize is an elusive concept. The number of divergent views demonstrates the complexi...
Cartels often act like single dominant firms. Because there are a number of difficulties in determin...
Although there is agreement on the basic economic principles that should apply to monopolization cas...
The efforts of activist antitrust lawyers to redefine the contours of attempted monopolization under...
Congress enacted the Sherman Act in 1890 and prohibited, among other practices, monopolization. To p...
In one sentence § 2 of the Sherman Act condemns firms who “monopolize,” “attempt to monopolize” or “...
The antitrust rules governing exclusionary conduct by dominant firms are among the most controversia...
The DOJ-FTC Merger Guidelines were developed for and best deal with horizontal mergers where the the...
This essay explores two different but related problems and how U.S. antitrust law and EU competition...
This report, which may be updated to further reflect congressional action, attempts to provide the a...
This chapter addresses issues in antitrust economics that related to the exercise of market power by...
The antitrust laws of the United States have, from their inception, allowed firms to acquire signifi...
Monopolization, the restriction of competition by a dominant firm, is regulated in roughly half of t...
The divergence between the economic and legal concepts of monopoly and the consequences thereof have...
The prohibition of certain types of anticompetitive unilateral conduct by firms possessing a substan...
Attempt to monopolize is an elusive concept. The number of divergent views demonstrates the complexi...
Cartels often act like single dominant firms. Because there are a number of difficulties in determin...
Although there is agreement on the basic economic principles that should apply to monopolization cas...
The efforts of activist antitrust lawyers to redefine the contours of attempted monopolization under...
Congress enacted the Sherman Act in 1890 and prohibited, among other practices, monopolization. To p...
In one sentence § 2 of the Sherman Act condemns firms who “monopolize,” “attempt to monopolize” or “...
The antitrust rules governing exclusionary conduct by dominant firms are among the most controversia...
The DOJ-FTC Merger Guidelines were developed for and best deal with horizontal mergers where the the...
This essay explores two different but related problems and how U.S. antitrust law and EU competition...
This report, which may be updated to further reflect congressional action, attempts to provide the a...
This chapter addresses issues in antitrust economics that related to the exercise of market power by...
The antitrust laws of the United States have, from their inception, allowed firms to acquire signifi...