We study the behavior of rules for the adjudication of con°icting claims when there are a large number of claimants with small claims. We model such situations by replicating some basic problem. We show that under replication, the random arrival rule (O'Neill, 1982) behaves like the proportional rule, the rule that is the most often recommended in this context. Also, under replication, the minimal overlap rule (O'Neill, 1982) behaves like the constrained equal losses rule, the rule that selects a division at which all claimants experience equal losses subject to no-one receiving a negative amount.Claims problems, Replication, Random arrival rule, Proportional rule, Minimal overlap rule, Constrained equal losses rule.
This paper considers the estate division problem from a non-cooperative perspective. The integer cla...
In this paper we introduce a new axiom, denoted claims separability, that is satisfied by several cl...
In the domain of bankruptcy problems, we show that non manipulability via merging and splitting clai...
For the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims, a rule is consistent if the choice it makes for ...
For the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims, we consider the requirement that each agent shou...
Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the proportional, constrained...
This paper reports an experimental study on three well-known solutions for problems of adjudicating ...
Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the proportional, constrained...
This paper reports an experimental study on three well-known solutions for problems of adjudicating ...
Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the pro-portional, constraine...
In a claims problem (O'Neill 1982), a group of individuals have claims on a resource but its endowme...
We propose two axioms that introduce lower bounds into resource monotonicity requirements for rules ...
Hart and Mas Colell (1989) introduce the potential function for cooperative TU games. In this paper,...
This paper considers the estate division problem from a non-cooperative perspective. The integer cla...
In this paper we introduce a new axiom, denoted claims separability, that is satisfied by several cl...
In the domain of bankruptcy problems, we show that non manipulability via merging and splitting clai...
For the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims, a rule is consistent if the choice it makes for ...
For the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims, we consider the requirement that each agent shou...
Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the proportional, constrained...
This paper reports an experimental study on three well-known solutions for problems of adjudicating ...
Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the proportional, constrained...
This paper reports an experimental study on three well-known solutions for problems of adjudicating ...
Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the pro-portional, constraine...
In a claims problem (O'Neill 1982), a group of individuals have claims on a resource but its endowme...
We propose two axioms that introduce lower bounds into resource monotonicity requirements for rules ...
Hart and Mas Colell (1989) introduce the potential function for cooperative TU games. In this paper,...
This paper considers the estate division problem from a non-cooperative perspective. The integer cla...
In this paper we introduce a new axiom, denoted claims separability, that is satisfied by several cl...
In the domain of bankruptcy problems, we show that non manipulability via merging and splitting clai...