The equivalence scales used to adjust for differences in family composition when measuring poverty exhibit considerable variation. This paper suggests an alternative approach that allows for differences in social judgements regarding the treatment of different types of family and examines the relation with the choice of poverty measure. The resulting dominance criteria cannot provide a complete ranking but allow the extent of disagreement to be identified. Their application is illustrated by the example of changes in child benefits. Copyright 1992 by The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Research Paper Number 938. ISSN 0819-2642, ISBN 0734025947This paper examines the sensitivity of ine...
Household equivalence scales are often used to help perform welfare comparisons across households wi...
Poverty evaluations differ from welfare evaluations in one significant aspect, the existence of a th...
The basic problem in poverty measurement is how to weigh the income of different groups. This is a ...
It is widely accepted that the level of family economic resources is important for child welfare – e...
In poverty and income inequality research, equivalence scales are used to adjust for the relative co...
The paper investigates the definition of equity-regarding poverty measures when there are different ...
This paper examines three basic issues in the measurement of poverty: the choice of poverty line, th...
The main aim of the paper is to contribute to the poverty measurement literature by demonstrating a ...
This thesis examines three questions concerned with the relative income needs of familiesof differen...
Do family size equivalence scales have a welfare interpretation? Whilst many economists routinely us...
Equivalence scales attempt to control for family size and composition, as well as the relative costs...
This paper points to some elementary conflicts between the claims of interpersonal and intergroup ju...
Poverty measurement based on income or consumption fails to be consistent with welfare: a higher uti...
Abstract: The authors present the theoretical bases and the results of an equivalence scale develope...
Research Paper Number 938. ISSN 0819-2642, ISBN 0734025947This paper examines the sensitivity of ine...
Household equivalence scales are often used to help perform welfare comparisons across households wi...
Poverty evaluations differ from welfare evaluations in one significant aspect, the existence of a th...
The basic problem in poverty measurement is how to weigh the income of different groups. This is a ...
It is widely accepted that the level of family economic resources is important for child welfare – e...
In poverty and income inequality research, equivalence scales are used to adjust for the relative co...
The paper investigates the definition of equity-regarding poverty measures when there are different ...
This paper examines three basic issues in the measurement of poverty: the choice of poverty line, th...
The main aim of the paper is to contribute to the poverty measurement literature by demonstrating a ...
This thesis examines three questions concerned with the relative income needs of familiesof differen...
Do family size equivalence scales have a welfare interpretation? Whilst many economists routinely us...
Equivalence scales attempt to control for family size and composition, as well as the relative costs...
This paper points to some elementary conflicts between the claims of interpersonal and intergroup ju...
Poverty measurement based on income or consumption fails to be consistent with welfare: a higher uti...
Abstract: The authors present the theoretical bases and the results of an equivalence scale develope...
Research Paper Number 938. ISSN 0819-2642, ISBN 0734025947This paper examines the sensitivity of ine...
Household equivalence scales are often used to help perform welfare comparisons across households wi...
Poverty evaluations differ from welfare evaluations in one significant aspect, the existence of a th...