A study on the relationships of vicarious traumatization, self-care, and organizational context for college counselors.

[[abstract]]中文摘要 本研究旨在探討不同背景大專院校諮商師在替代性創傷、自我照顧及組織脈絡上之差異情形，以及大專院校諮商師之背景變項對替代性創傷、自我照顧及組織脈絡之預測力；同時探討大專院校諮商師之替代性創傷、自我照顧及組織脈絡間之關係，進而提出在替代性創傷、自我照顧及組織脈絡間之路徑模式，並驗證其適切性。 本研究採用「替代性創傷傾向量表」、「自我照顧量表」、「組織脈絡量表」為工具，以北中南東48所大專院校中，共322位大專院校諮商師（男性56人，女性262人）為正式研究對象。調查結果，分別以單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、簡單迴歸、多元迴歸以及路徑分析等統計方法進行分析，結果獲得以下幾點重要發現： 一、不同服務年資及不同服務狀態之大專院校諮商師，在替代性創傷及組織脈絡上有顯著差異存在。不同接案時數之大專院校諮商師，在自我照顧上有顯著差異存在。受不同個案影響類型之大專院校諮商師，在替代性創傷上有顯著差異存在。 二、大專院校諮商師之接案時數能有效預測替代性創傷、自我照顧及組織脈絡；而年資能有效預測替代性創傷。 三、大專院校諮商師之替代性創傷與組織脈絡間有顯著相關存在。 四、大專院校諮商師之組織脈絡能有效預測替代性創傷；且自我照顧及組織脈絡能有效預測替代性創傷。 五、「自我照顧及組織脈絡會影響替代性創傷；而自我照顧及組織脈絡之間會互相影響」之路徑模式未成立。 本研究尚依據研究結果，針對助人者、大學學輔中心之專業組織、以及助人者各階段教育等諮商輔導實務方面之應用，以及未來之研究提出建議。[[abstract]]Abstract The purpose of this research was to investigate differences and relationships among vicarious traumatization, self-care, and organizational context for college counselors, and to conduct a path analysis of them. The subjects were 322 college counselors (56 males & 262 females are included) from 48 universities and colleges in Taiwan. Instruments used in the study were: Vicarious Traumatization Scale, Self-care Scale, and Organizational Context Scale. Data collected were analyzed by ANOVA, Pearson Productmoment Correlation, Multiple Regression and Path Analysis. The main findings were as follows: 1. The different years of experience and professional titles of college counselors showed significant difference in vicarious traumatization and organizational context. In addition, different service hours of college counselors showed significant difference in self-care. The different problems which were affected from clients of college counselors showed significant difference in vicarious traumatization. 2. Vicarious traumatization, self-care and organizational context could be predicted effectively by different service hours of college counselors. Besides, vicarious traumatization could be predicted effectively by different years of experience of college counselors. 3. There were a negative correlation between college counselors’ vicarious traumatization and organizational context. 4. It is possible to predict vicarious traumatization effectively by using college counselors’ organizational context; college counselors’ self-care and organizational context could effectively predict theirs vicarious traumatization. 5. The path analysis “College counselors’ self-care and organizational context influenced vicarious traumatization; meanwhile, self-care and organizational context were influenced mutually.” did not verify its fitness. Based upon the above mentioned results, discussions and suggestions about this research were presented.[[note]]碩