In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Devlin v. Scardelletti that objecting class members could appeal a federal district court’s approval of a class settlement without first intervening in the litigation. Public interest lawyer Brian Wolfman says the ruling was a victory for both objectors and the integrity of class action procedure: Objectors, he argues, help keep fairness hearings fair. But a number of courts are now ruling that Devlin only applies to non-opt-out class actions, rather than the much more numerous ones that give class members opt-out rights. In this article, Wolfman details the exact wording of the Supreme Court decision and asserts that the high court clearly did not limit the application of Devlin
It is reasonable to expect that courts will demonstrate great solicitude for the recent innovation t...
It is reasonable to expect that courts will demonstrate great solicitude for the recent innovation t...
Ever since the enactment of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), plaintiffs attorneys hav...
In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Devlin v. Scardelletti that objecting class members could a...
The idea for this article came from the author\u27s representation of a national non-profit consumer...
The idea for this article came from the author\u27s representation of a national non-profit consumer...
I represent a national non-profit consumer rights organization, as an amicus, in a federal appeal ch...
(Excerpt) This Article proposes changes in the way courts evaluate objections and the persons who br...
This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 23,...
Problems of appellate jurisdiction are, by their nature, mainly pragmatic problems. The U.S. Circuit...
Class action litigation seeks to mediate pressing conflicts between individual autonomy and collecti...
Problems of appellate jurisdiction are, by their nature, mainly pragmatic problems. The U.S. Circuit...
For a wide variety of claims against the government, the federal courthouse doors are closed to all ...
The idea for this article came from the author\u27s representation of a national non-profit consumer...
It is reasonable to expect that courts will demonstrate great solicitude for the recent innovation t...
It is reasonable to expect that courts will demonstrate great solicitude for the recent innovation t...
It is reasonable to expect that courts will demonstrate great solicitude for the recent innovation t...
Ever since the enactment of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), plaintiffs attorneys hav...
In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Devlin v. Scardelletti that objecting class members could a...
The idea for this article came from the author\u27s representation of a national non-profit consumer...
The idea for this article came from the author\u27s representation of a national non-profit consumer...
I represent a national non-profit consumer rights organization, as an amicus, in a federal appeal ch...
(Excerpt) This Article proposes changes in the way courts evaluate objections and the persons who br...
This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 23,...
Problems of appellate jurisdiction are, by their nature, mainly pragmatic problems. The U.S. Circuit...
Class action litigation seeks to mediate pressing conflicts between individual autonomy and collecti...
Problems of appellate jurisdiction are, by their nature, mainly pragmatic problems. The U.S. Circuit...
For a wide variety of claims against the government, the federal courthouse doors are closed to all ...
The idea for this article came from the author\u27s representation of a national non-profit consumer...
It is reasonable to expect that courts will demonstrate great solicitude for the recent innovation t...
It is reasonable to expect that courts will demonstrate great solicitude for the recent innovation t...
It is reasonable to expect that courts will demonstrate great solicitude for the recent innovation t...
Ever since the enactment of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), plaintiffs attorneys hav...