Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court has approved a uniform code of evidence for all federal courts. Amendments to the Supreme Court\u27s rules are now pending in the House of Representatives. From the point of view of a specialist in the law of evidence, Professor Rothstein analyzes the differences between the Supreme Court\u27s proposals and the House amendments and suggests solutions to these conflicts
The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence (the Rules) resulted in a more liberal standard for th...
The most significant development in federal trial procedure in recent years has been the enactment o...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
The Supreme Court has approved a uniform code of evidence for all federal courts. Amendments to the ...
The Supreme Court has approved a uniform code of evidence for all federal courts. Amendments to the ...
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules ...
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many...
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed R...
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules ...
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence become effective three years from initial ...
Proposed far-reaching changes in the Federal Rules of Evidence are of major practical significance t...
This history is indicative of the conflict between the Court and Congress over the Court\u27s author...
This history is indicative of the conflict between the Court and Congress over the Court\u27s author...
This history is indicative of the conflict between the Court and Congress over the Court\u27s author...
The Ohio Supreme Court has twice promulgated and the Ohio General Assembly has twice disapproved the...
The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence (the Rules) resulted in a more liberal standard for th...
The most significant development in federal trial procedure in recent years has been the enactment o...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
The Supreme Court has approved a uniform code of evidence for all federal courts. Amendments to the ...
The Supreme Court has approved a uniform code of evidence for all federal courts. Amendments to the ...
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules ...
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many...
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed R...
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules ...
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence become effective three years from initial ...
Proposed far-reaching changes in the Federal Rules of Evidence are of major practical significance t...
This history is indicative of the conflict between the Court and Congress over the Court\u27s author...
This history is indicative of the conflict between the Court and Congress over the Court\u27s author...
This history is indicative of the conflict between the Court and Congress over the Court\u27s author...
The Ohio Supreme Court has twice promulgated and the Ohio General Assembly has twice disapproved the...
The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence (the Rules) resulted in a more liberal standard for th...
The most significant development in federal trial procedure in recent years has been the enactment o...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...