This article provides a comparative study of four major dimensions of corporate governance in the U.S. and Germany: (1) the laws affecting corporate governance, particularly those designed to protect minority shareholders; (2) the prescribed role and actual conduct of corporate boards; (3) the market for corporate control (including hostile takeovers); and (4) incentive compensation. 2005 Morgan Stanley.
This article discusses a more unified approach to two key areas of business law (corporate governanc...
The purpose of this study was to discover if and how the EU and US have approached dual-class shares...
Recent research has documented large di!erences among countries in ownership concentration in public...
The paper undertakes a comparative study of the set of laws affecting corporate governance in the Un...
In Germany, the role of shareholders in the structure of corporate governance has recently been the ...
This article reviews Germany''s corporate governance system and the effectiveness of recent reforms....
Corporate Governance has developed immensely in the last decades mainly due to the negative effects ...
In this article, I provide a comparative historical account on the debate of whether corporations sh...
The U.S. corporate governance system failed in 2002, and again in 2008, leading to the deepest econo...
The fundamental problem of corporate governance in the United States isto alleviate the conflict of ...
The focus of comparative corporate governance scholarship is shifting from takeovers to controlling ...
Corporate governance broadly refers to the mechanisms, processes and relations by which corporations...
This paper provides an overview of the German corporate governance system. We review the governance ...
Corporate governance in the United States is about alleviating the conflict of interest between disp...
This article sets forth an argument as to why the empowerment of stakeholder investors presents the ...
This article discusses a more unified approach to two key areas of business law (corporate governanc...
The purpose of this study was to discover if and how the EU and US have approached dual-class shares...
Recent research has documented large di!erences among countries in ownership concentration in public...
The paper undertakes a comparative study of the set of laws affecting corporate governance in the Un...
In Germany, the role of shareholders in the structure of corporate governance has recently been the ...
This article reviews Germany''s corporate governance system and the effectiveness of recent reforms....
Corporate Governance has developed immensely in the last decades mainly due to the negative effects ...
In this article, I provide a comparative historical account on the debate of whether corporations sh...
The U.S. corporate governance system failed in 2002, and again in 2008, leading to the deepest econo...
The fundamental problem of corporate governance in the United States isto alleviate the conflict of ...
The focus of comparative corporate governance scholarship is shifting from takeovers to controlling ...
Corporate governance broadly refers to the mechanisms, processes and relations by which corporations...
This paper provides an overview of the German corporate governance system. We review the governance ...
Corporate governance in the United States is about alleviating the conflict of interest between disp...
This article sets forth an argument as to why the empowerment of stakeholder investors presents the ...
This article discusses a more unified approach to two key areas of business law (corporate governanc...
The purpose of this study was to discover if and how the EU and US have approached dual-class shares...
Recent research has documented large di!erences among countries in ownership concentration in public...