Numerical modeling of separated flows at moderate Reynolds numbers appropriate for turbine blades and unmanned aero vehicles

2015-06-22Flows over airfoils and blades in rotating machinery, for unmanned and micro-aerial vehicles, wind turbines, and propellers consist of a laminar boundary layer near the leading edge that is often followed by a laminar separation bubble and transition to turbulence further downstream. Typical Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence models are inadequate for such flows. Direct numerical simulation is the most reliable, but is also the most computationally expensive alternative. This work assesses the capability of immersed boundary methods and large eddy simulations to reduce the computational requirements for such flows and still provide high quality results. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional simulations of a laminar separation bubble on a NACA-0012 airfoil at Rec = 5×10⁴ and at 5° of incidence have been performed with an immersed boundary code and a commercial code using body fitted grids. Several sub-grid scale models have been implemented in both codes and their performance evaluated. For the two-dimensional simulations with the immersed boundary method the results show good agreement with the direct numerical simulation benchmark data for the pressure coefficient Cp and the friction coefficient Cf, but only when using dissipative numerical schemes. There is evidence that this behavior can be attributed to the ability of dissipative schemes to damp numerical noise coming from the immersed boundary. For the three-dimensional simulations the results show a good prediction of the separation point, but an inaccurate prediction of the reattachment point unless full direct numerical simulation resolution is used. The commercial code shows good agreement with the direct numerical simulation benchmark data in both two and three-dimensional simulations, but the presence of significant, unquantified numerical dissipation prevents a conclusive assessment of the actual prediction capabilities of very coarse large eddy simulations with low order schemes in general cases. Additionally, a two-dimensional sweep of angles of attack from 0° to 5° is performed showing a qualitative prediction of the jump in lift and drag coefficients due to the appearance of the laminar separation bubble. The numerical dissipation inhibits the predictive capabilities of large eddy simulations whenever it is of the same order of magnitude or larger than the sub-grid scale dissipation. The need to estimate the numerical dissipation is most pressing for low-order methods employed by commercial computational fluid dynamics codes. Following the recent work of Schranner et al., the equations and procedure for estimating the numerical dissipation rate and the numerical viscosity in a commercial code are presented. The method allows for the computation of the numerical dissipation rate and numerical viscosity in the physical space for arbitrary sub-domains in a self-consistent way, using only information provided by the code in question. The method is first tested for a three-dimensional Taylor-Green vortex flow in a simple cubic domain and compared with benchmark results obtained using an accurate, incompressible spectral solver. Afterwards the same procedure is applied for the first time to a realistic flow configuration, specifically to the above discussed laminar separation bubble flow over a NACA 0012 airfoil. The method appears to be quite robust and its application reveals that for the code and the flow in question the numerical dissipation can be significantly larger than the viscous dissipation or the dissipation of the classical Smagorinsky sub-grid scale model, confirming the previously qualitative finding