We examine the legislative game with open rules proposed by Baron and Ferejohn (1989). We first show that the three-group equilibrium suggested by Baron and Ferejohn does not always obtain. Second, we characterize the set of stationary equilibria for simple and super majority rules. Such equilibria are either of the three-group or four-group type. The latter type tends to occur when the size of the legislature becomes larger. Moreover, four-group equilibria imply large delay costs.Baron/Ferejohn model, bargaining in legislatures, open rules, threegroup and four-group equilibria
Abstract. Three-player majority-rule bargaining games have begun to receive some atten-tion in the e...
This paper studies a sequential model of multilateral bargaining under majority rule in which legisl...
It is commonly believed that voting rules that are relatively more inclusive (e.g., unanimity or sup...
We examine the legislative game with open rules proposed by Baron and Ferejohn (1989). We first show...
We conduct experiments to investigate the effects of different majority requirements on bargaining o...
We present a general model of legislative bargaining in which the status quo is an arbitrary point i...
We investigate the Baron-Ferejohn (1989) legislative bargaining model comparing open versus closed a...
We present a general model of legislative bargaining in which the status quo is an arbitrary point ...
We investigate the differential effects of open versus closed amendment rules within the frameworkof...
We present a general model of legislative bargaining in which the status quo is an arbitrary point i...
We investigate the relationship between parties\u27 patience and continuation values in legislative ...
We study a legislative bargaining game in which failure to agree in a given round may result in a br...
We study the division of a surplus under majoritarian bargaining in the three-person case. In a stat...
We study the division of a surplus under majoritarian bargaining in the three-person case. In a stat...
Experiments can be used to relax technical assumptions that are made by necessity in theoretical ana...
Abstract. Three-player majority-rule bargaining games have begun to receive some atten-tion in the e...
This paper studies a sequential model of multilateral bargaining under majority rule in which legisl...
It is commonly believed that voting rules that are relatively more inclusive (e.g., unanimity or sup...
We examine the legislative game with open rules proposed by Baron and Ferejohn (1989). We first show...
We conduct experiments to investigate the effects of different majority requirements on bargaining o...
We present a general model of legislative bargaining in which the status quo is an arbitrary point i...
We investigate the Baron-Ferejohn (1989) legislative bargaining model comparing open versus closed a...
We present a general model of legislative bargaining in which the status quo is an arbitrary point ...
We investigate the differential effects of open versus closed amendment rules within the frameworkof...
We present a general model of legislative bargaining in which the status quo is an arbitrary point i...
We investigate the relationship between parties\u27 patience and continuation values in legislative ...
We study a legislative bargaining game in which failure to agree in a given round may result in a br...
We study the division of a surplus under majoritarian bargaining in the three-person case. In a stat...
We study the division of a surplus under majoritarian bargaining in the three-person case. In a stat...
Experiments can be used to relax technical assumptions that are made by necessity in theoretical ana...
Abstract. Three-player majority-rule bargaining games have begun to receive some atten-tion in the e...
This paper studies a sequential model of multilateral bargaining under majority rule in which legisl...
It is commonly believed that voting rules that are relatively more inclusive (e.g., unanimity or sup...