This article uses the option pricing arguments of Merton (1974) to demonstrate that even solvent banks will be reluctant to sell volatile, toxic assets at market prices. Banks' shareholders have insolvency puts that give them limited liability in the event of default. The insolvency puts are more valuable when the banks' assets are more volatile. Shareholders in banks will require any buyer to pay for the lost volatility as well as the market price of the toxic assets. Thus, taxpayers must be ready to richly overpay if they want banks to voluntarily part with their toxic assets.
In toxic tort litigation, a plaintiff has no cause of action for increased risk of harm unless that ...
Buying put options is commonly understood to provide a measure of insurance against price declines. ...
Modern finance is increasingly dominated by derivatives and similar contracts that create contingent...
[[abstract]]Will banks be willing to sell their toxic loans with the help of the Troubled Asset Reli...
We present a model in which banks trade toxic assets to fund investments. Adverse selection in toxic...
[[abstract]]This article extends the framework of Merton (1974) with Vassalou and Xing (2004) to val...
Abstract: Will banks be willing to sell their toxic loans with the help of the Troubled Asset Relief...
This paper studies banksdecision whether to borrow from the interbank market or to sell assets in or...
[[abstract]]This article extends the framework of Merton (1974) with Vassalou and Xing (2004) to val...
This article is devoted to solving a problem of controversial assets. The author discusses various m...
The term "toxic asset" is a nontechnical term used to describe certain financial assets whose value ...
liquidity creating banks in an otherwise standard general equilibrium growth model. A capital requir...
Abstract: In moral hazard models, bank shareholders have incentives to transfer wealth from the depo...
Liquidity risk was conspicuous in the recent financial market turbulence. This paper presents a liqu...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in ...
In toxic tort litigation, a plaintiff has no cause of action for increased risk of harm unless that ...
Buying put options is commonly understood to provide a measure of insurance against price declines. ...
Modern finance is increasingly dominated by derivatives and similar contracts that create contingent...
[[abstract]]Will banks be willing to sell their toxic loans with the help of the Troubled Asset Reli...
We present a model in which banks trade toxic assets to fund investments. Adverse selection in toxic...
[[abstract]]This article extends the framework of Merton (1974) with Vassalou and Xing (2004) to val...
Abstract: Will banks be willing to sell their toxic loans with the help of the Troubled Asset Relief...
This paper studies banksdecision whether to borrow from the interbank market or to sell assets in or...
[[abstract]]This article extends the framework of Merton (1974) with Vassalou and Xing (2004) to val...
This article is devoted to solving a problem of controversial assets. The author discusses various m...
The term "toxic asset" is a nontechnical term used to describe certain financial assets whose value ...
liquidity creating banks in an otherwise standard general equilibrium growth model. A capital requir...
Abstract: In moral hazard models, bank shareholders have incentives to transfer wealth from the depo...
Liquidity risk was conspicuous in the recent financial market turbulence. This paper presents a liqu...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in ...
In toxic tort litigation, a plaintiff has no cause of action for increased risk of harm unless that ...
Buying put options is commonly understood to provide a measure of insurance against price declines. ...
Modern finance is increasingly dominated by derivatives and similar contracts that create contingent...