VIDEO SURVEILLANCE IN SECURITY INDUSTRY

Video nadzor je varnostni ukrep, ki je z uvedbo novih informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij postal tako enostaven in poceni, da je primeren za široko in ne več le za profesionalno uporabo. Da bi bilo to možno, je bilo potrebno varnostnim subjektom vzeti izključno pravico do uporabe video nadzora ter ga prepustiti širšemu naboru uporabnikov. Tako so zadovoljni proizvajalci, trgovci in kupci, pa tudi zasebno varovanje, saj tako uspešnega prodajnega artikla še ni imelo. Zasebno varovanje je popolnoma brez pretresov sprejelo spremembo svojega krovnega zakona, ko je zakonodajalec iz njega izbrisal uporabo video nadzora iz nabora ukrepov varnostnika. Pravna ureditev video nadzora, ki je še vedno prvenstveno namenjen varovanju ljudi in premoženja, je bila prenesena v zakon, ki je namenjen varovanju osebnih podatkov, kjer pa je verjetno tudi zaradi pričakovane neprofesionalne rabe, bistveno bolj natančno opredeljen. Vendar je tak le zunanji videz video nadzora kot družbenega pojava. V resnici gre za občutljivo področje tehtanja med varnostjo in svobodo, nadzorom in vohljanjem, legalnostjo in legitimnostjo. Teh odločitev ni modro prepuščati ne trgu ne presoji posameznika, oba sta namreč razcepljena: do lastnih interesov popustljiva, do drugih stroga. Ponovna profesionalizacija video nadzora je videti kot dobra rešitev teh dilem, tako mu je najlažje zagotoviti zakonito, strokovno in sorazmerno oziroma humano rabo. Pod takimi pogoji bi morebiti lahko dodelili upravljavcem, varnostnim subjektom, pravnim osebam s strokovnim in varnostno preverjenim kadrom nekoliko večja pooblastila pri uporabi te izjemne tehnologije, da bo končno lahko dajala rezultate, ki bodo uporabnikom res v prid.Video surveillance is a security measure which has with the introduction of information and communication technology become so simple and cheap that it is suitable for a wide and not only for professional use. To make this possible it was necessary to take the exclusive right of using video surveillance from security operators and leave it to a wider range of users, so producers, buyers and customers are satisfied and private security as well because they have never had such a successful selling item yet. Private security accepted completely without stress a change to its general law when the legislature deleted the use of video surveillance from a set of measures of security guard. Legal arrangement of video surveillance, which is still primarily aimed at protecting people and property, has been transposed to the law, which is designed for the protection of personal data, where it is, probably also because of the expected professional use, far more precisely defined. However this is only the external appearance of video surveillance as a social phenomenon. In fact it is a sensitive area of balancing between security and freedom, control and snooping, legality and legitimacy. It is not wise to leave these decisions nor to the market nor to the individual judgment, because both are namely partitioned: indulgent to their own interests and strict towards others. Re-professionalization of video surveillance seems to be the best solution to these dilemmas, so this is the easiest way to provide legal, professional, proportional and human use. Under such conditions it would possibly be assigned slightly bigger powers to administrators, security operators and legal entities with professional verified staff in the usage of this exceptional technology, that it could finally give some results that could buyers really benefit from