CMMI-based comparison of open source project development environments

V diplomskem delu predstavimo primerjavo štirih spletnih okolij, namenjenih razvoju odprtega programja z vidika zmožnostno zrelostnega modela. Na začetku predstavimo združeni zmožnostno zrelostni model in uradne metode za izvajanje presoje doseganja njegovih ciljev. Predstavimo tudi splošne lastnosti izvajanja primerjalne študije in odprtokodni model razvoja programske opreme. Nato na kratko predstavimo okolja SourceForge, GitHub, Launchpad in CodePlex ter primerjamo njihove funkcionalnosti in priljubljenost glede na število projektov, ki uporabljajo ta okolja. Glede na podporo doseganja ciljev posameznih procesnih področij združenega zmožnostno zrelostnega modela nato s pomočjo rezultatov presoje in rezultatov primerjave presoj posameznih spletnih okolij izberemo okolje SourceForge kot okolje, ki nudi največ funkcionalnosti za doseganje ciljev teh procesnih področij. Na koncu podamo tudi nekaj predlogov za morebitne nadaljnje raziskave.In this graduation thesis we present a comparison of four web-based environments for the development of open source software from the point of view of the Capability Maturity Model Integration. In the beginning we present the Capability Maturity Model Integration and the official methods for conducting appraisals in achieving its goals. We also present the general characteristics of a comparative study and the open source model of software development. Then we briefly present the environments SourceForge, GitHub, Launchpad and CodePlex and compare their features and popularity based on the number of projects which use them. We then, based on the level of support in achieving the goals of individual process areas of the Capability Maturity Model Integration, and with the help of appraisal results and the comparison of the results from the appraisals of individual web environments choose SourceForge as the environment that offers the most functionalities for achieving the goals of the process areas. At the end we then propose some suggestions for eventual further research