JUDICIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF PATERNITY - COMPARISON BETWEEN SLOVENIA AND CROATIA

Diplomska naloga v osnovi predstavlja institut sodnega ugotavljanja očetovstva, zraven pa tudi dva njemu sorodna instituta, saj so med seboj vsi posredno povezani in se navezujejo eden na drugega. To sta izpodbijanje in priznanje očetovstva. Raziskava in preučevanje tematike se razteza tako na slovensko kot hrvaško zakonodajo in predstavlja primerjalno pravni vidik posamezne ureditve med državama. Zanimive so ugotovitve, da med državama, ki sta nekoč spadali pod skupno državo in katerih zakonska ureditev izhaja iz enakih temeljev, prihaja danes do določenih razlik, kar predstavlja drugačno miselnost pri posameznih zakonodajalcih. Nekaj besed namenjamo tudi metodam s pomočjo katerih se očetovstvo dandanes ugotavlja. Predvsem gre za metode medicinske in biološke znanosti, ki vsaka po sebi z večjo ali manjšo verjetnostjo pripomorejo k ugotavljanju biološke resnice. Ugotovitev, kako oziroma če sploh in v kolikšni meri se sodnega ugotavljanja očetovstva ljudje v praksi sploh poslužujejo, je predstavljena na podlagi pridobljenih podatkov z Urada Okrožnega sodišča v Murski Soboti. Prikazani so podatki vloženih in rešenih zadev za obdobje 1995 – 2014.The thesis essentially represents the institution of judicial establishment of paternity, and, in addition, two similar institutions, as they are all indirectly connected with each other. These are contest of paternity and acknowledgment of fatherhoof. The research and study of the subject extend to both Slovenian and Croatian legislation and represent comparative legal aspects of the arrangements between the two countries. The findings are interesting, because the countries, which used to belong to the same country and which law order comes out from the same bases, now have certain differences, which portray a different mentality of individual legislators. There are also mentioned methods for establishing paternity. These are mainly methods of medical and biological sciences, which each with its own greater or lesser probability contribute to the establishment of biological truth. The finding, how or if people even use the judicial establishment of paternity at all, and to what extent in practice, is presented based on data obtained from the Office of the District Court in Murska Sobota. Data is shown based on filed and resolved cases for the period from 1995 to 2014