Freedom of deciding on vaccination

V diplomskem delu smo obravnavali temo z naslovom Svoboda odločanja o cepljenju. Glavni namen diplomskega dela je bil predstaviti cepljenje ter njegovo vlogo in pomen za posameznika in skupnost ter proučiti možnosti svobodnega odločanja o cepljenju in utemeljiti, ali je racionalno dopustiti to možnost. Metodi, ki smo ju uporabili pri pisanju naloge, sta deskriptivna ali opisna metoda ter analiza podatkov. Predstavili smo bolezni, proti katerim cepimo v Republiki Sloveniji, cepljenje in njegov pomen ter cepiva in njihovo varnost. Izpostavili smo etične dileme povezane s cepljenjem in varnostjo le tega ter proučili in analizirali možnosti svobodnega odločanja o cepljenju. V diplomskem delu smo raziskali dobre in slabe strani svobodnega odločanja o cepljenju ter samo možnost o svobodnem cepljenju. V sklopu diskusije smo ugotovili več dobrih in slabih strani svobodnega odločanja o cepljenju, med katerimi bi bilo potrebno postaviti črto, ki bi eno in drugo stran uravnotežilo. Na koncu diplomskega dela se nam je odprlo veliko nerazrešenih, novih vprašanj povezanih z dopustitvijo možnosti svobodnega cepljenja, ki bi lahko mnogo vplivala na razrešitev te dileme.In a dissertation we deliberated theme with title Freedom of deciding on vaccination. Main purpose of a dissertation was to introduce vaccination and his role both importance for an individual and community and to research possibility of free deciding on vaccination and to justify is it rational to allow this possibility. Methods we used at writing dissertation are descriptive method and method of data analysis. We introduced diseases that we prevent with vaccination in Slovenia, vaccination and its meaning and vaccines and their safety. We exposed vaccination ethical dilemmas and safety of vaccination and investigated and analysed possibilities of free deciding on vaccination. We researched good and bad sides of free deciding on vaccination and possibility on free vaccination. In discussion we found out a lot of good and bad sides of free deciding on vaccination, between which it would be necessary to set line that would balance both sides. At the end of a dissertation, it opened to us many unsolved, new questions in association with possibility of free vaccination, that could influence a lot on dismissal of that dilemma