One of the most important and most contentious issues for regulation and competition raised by the 1996 Telecommunications Act is when to authorize the regional Bell companies to offer long-distance services. The Department of Justice (DOJ) adopted a standard requiring that a Bell's local market must first be irreversibly open to competition. This paper analyzes the competitive benefits and costs of authorizing Bell entry, explains the DOJ's standard, and argues that the incentives created by this standard will help achieve the Act's competitive goals more efficiently and rapidly than other standards, ultimately reducing the need for intrusive regulation.
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/115904/1/rand12109.pdfhttp://deepblue.l...
Competition in telecommunications is being promoted throughout the world with extensive liberalisati...
Evans in the preparation of this paper. The views expressed are solely those of the authors, and do ...
At this writing, the FCC has denied Bell Operating Company applications for entry into in-region int...
The Telecommunications Act mandates the opening of local telephone markets to competition. The trans...
The overriding goal of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is to promote competition in all telecommu...
The 1996 Telecommunications Act opened the monopolistic U.S. local telephone industry to new entrant...
This paper explores the relationship between technology and the policies that govern competition in ...
After surveying the events that led to the gradual introduction of competition in US telecommunicati...
This article challenges the conventional wisdom that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is to blame ...
The 1996 Telecommunications Act represents a major turn in U.S. policy towards 'deregulation.' Inste...
This Article explains the monopoly rationale for conventional approaches to telecommunications regul...
As the United States and the other Western Industrialized Nations advance to the Twenty-first Centur...
Local telephone companies have long been regulated as natural monopolies. However, technological inn...
Current telecommunications regulation is based on a series of economic assumptions. The author consi...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/115904/1/rand12109.pdfhttp://deepblue.l...
Competition in telecommunications is being promoted throughout the world with extensive liberalisati...
Evans in the preparation of this paper. The views expressed are solely those of the authors, and do ...
At this writing, the FCC has denied Bell Operating Company applications for entry into in-region int...
The Telecommunications Act mandates the opening of local telephone markets to competition. The trans...
The overriding goal of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is to promote competition in all telecommu...
The 1996 Telecommunications Act opened the monopolistic U.S. local telephone industry to new entrant...
This paper explores the relationship between technology and the policies that govern competition in ...
After surveying the events that led to the gradual introduction of competition in US telecommunicati...
This article challenges the conventional wisdom that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is to blame ...
The 1996 Telecommunications Act represents a major turn in U.S. policy towards 'deregulation.' Inste...
This Article explains the monopoly rationale for conventional approaches to telecommunications regul...
As the United States and the other Western Industrialized Nations advance to the Twenty-first Centur...
Local telephone companies have long been regulated as natural monopolies. However, technological inn...
Current telecommunications regulation is based on a series of economic assumptions. The author consi...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/115904/1/rand12109.pdfhttp://deepblue.l...
Competition in telecommunications is being promoted throughout the world with extensive liberalisati...
Evans in the preparation of this paper. The views expressed are solely those of the authors, and do ...