We show how the use of panel data methods such as those proposed in single equations by Kao (1999) and Pedroni (1999) or in systems by Larsson and Lyhagen (1999) to investigate economic hypotheses such as purchasing power parity or the term structure of interest rates may be affected by the existence of cross-unit cointegrating relations. The existing literature assumes that such relations, that tie the units of the panel together, are not present. Using empirical examples from a panel of OECD countries we show that this assumption is very likely to be violated. Simulations of the properties of panel cointegration tests in the presence of cross-unit relations are then presented to demonstrate the serious cost of assuming away such relations...
With the advent of the results on non-stationary data in time series econometrics and the increased ...
Recent empirical studies suggest that the Fisher hypothesis, stating that inflation and nominal inte...
This paper enlarges on Karlsoon and Löthgreen’s (2000) results on panel unit root tests to panel coi...
A common finding in the empirical literature on the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) is tha...
This paper applies the recently developed maximum-likelihood-panel cointegration method of Larsson a...
This thesis develops new techniques for analyzing cointegrated relationships in panel data. The firs...
International Economic Policy An IV approach, using as instruments nonlinear transformations of the ...
We follow the behavioral equilibrium exchange rate approach by Clark and MacDonald (1998) to derive ...
The monetary exchange rate models explain the long run behaviour of the nominal exchange rate. Their...
There is a burgeoning literature based on using panel cointegration techniques to study the relation...
There is a burgeoning literature based on using panel cointegration techniques to study the relation...
New multivariate panel cointegration methods are used to analyze nominal exchange rates and prices i...
Panel unit-root and no-cointegration tests that rely on cross-sectional independence of the panel un...
We use meta-analytic procedures to develop new tests for panel cointegration, combining p-values fro...
This paper re-examines the validity of the monetary exchange rate model during the post-Bretton Wood...
With the advent of the results on non-stationary data in time series econometrics and the increased ...
Recent empirical studies suggest that the Fisher hypothesis, stating that inflation and nominal inte...
This paper enlarges on Karlsoon and Löthgreen’s (2000) results on panel unit root tests to panel coi...
A common finding in the empirical literature on the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) is tha...
This paper applies the recently developed maximum-likelihood-panel cointegration method of Larsson a...
This thesis develops new techniques for analyzing cointegrated relationships in panel data. The firs...
International Economic Policy An IV approach, using as instruments nonlinear transformations of the ...
We follow the behavioral equilibrium exchange rate approach by Clark and MacDonald (1998) to derive ...
The monetary exchange rate models explain the long run behaviour of the nominal exchange rate. Their...
There is a burgeoning literature based on using panel cointegration techniques to study the relation...
There is a burgeoning literature based on using panel cointegration techniques to study the relation...
New multivariate panel cointegration methods are used to analyze nominal exchange rates and prices i...
Panel unit-root and no-cointegration tests that rely on cross-sectional independence of the panel un...
We use meta-analytic procedures to develop new tests for panel cointegration, combining p-values fro...
This paper re-examines the validity of the monetary exchange rate model during the post-Bretton Wood...
With the advent of the results on non-stationary data in time series econometrics and the increased ...
Recent empirical studies suggest that the Fisher hypothesis, stating that inflation and nominal inte...
This paper enlarges on Karlsoon and Löthgreen’s (2000) results on panel unit root tests to panel coi...