A resolution of this case, viz. Whether it be lawful to separate from the publick worship of God in the parochial assemblies of England, upon that new pretence, which some men make, of the case being much altered now from what it was, when the Puritans wrote against the Brownists and the Presbyterians against the Independent

A serious address to the members of the Episcopal separation in New-England. Occasioned by Mr. Wetmore's Vindication of the professors of the Church of England in Connecticut. : Being an attempt to fix and settle these three points, I. Whether the inhabitants of the British plantations in America, those of New-England in particular, are obliged, in point of duty, by the laws of God or man, to conform to the prelatic church, by law established in the south part of Great Britain. II. Whether it be proper in point of prudence for those who are already settled in such churches as have so long subsisted in New-England, to forsake them and go over to that communion. III. Whether it be lawful for particular members of New-England churches to separate from them, and join in communion with the Episcopal assemblies in the country. / By Noah Hobart, A.M. Pastor of the Church of Christ in Fairfield. ; [Two lines from Proverbs]

Hobart, Noah, 1706-1773.

January 1748

139, [1] p. ; 18 cm. (8vo)Half-title: Mr. Hobart's serious address to the members of the Episcopal ...

The vnreasonablenesse of the separation Made apparant, by an examination of Mr. Iohnsons pretended reasons, published an. 1608. Wherby hee laboureth to iustifie his schisme from the church assemblies of England.

Bradshaw, William, 1571-1618.
Ames, William, 1576-1633. Manudicition for Mr. Robinson.

January 1614

[128] p.By William Bradshaw. Includes: Ames, William. A manudiction for Mr. Robinson."The unreasonab...

Jerubbaal justified: or, A plain rebuke of the high (pretended humble) remonstrance and plea against Mr. Crofton his reformation not separation or, a plea for communion with the church under those corruptions, and by that disorderly ministration, to which he cannot conform, nor by it administer. Demonstrating, T.P. (alias D.) his grosse mistakes of Mr. Crofton his principle and argument: as also the fallacie and vanity of his pleaded necessity for his (confessed) separation from publique assemblies, which is found insufficient to acquit him of schisme. To which is added a position, disputing the lawfulnesse of ministers receiving an imposed liturgy.

R. S.
Crofton, Zachary, 1625 or 6-1672. Reformation not separation.

January 1663

[10], 43, [1] p.A reply to Crofton's Reformation not separation.This is a replacement for incomplete...

The unreasonablnes of the separation made apparent, in an examination of, and answere to, certaine reasons of Maister Francis Johnson: whereby he laboureth to justifie his schisme from the church assemblies of England; By Maister VVilliam Bradshaw deceased. Together with a rejoinder, in defence of the said answere against the late reply of Maister Iohn Canne (a leader to a company of Brownists in Amsterdam) thereunto, by a freind [sic] of the deceased.

Bradshaw, William, 1571-1618.

January 1640

[8], 149, [1] p.Another edition, revised, of part 1 of STC 3532, which answers Francis Johnson's "Ce...

Separation examined: or, a treatise vvherein the grounds for separation from the ministry and churches of England are weighed, and found too light. The practise proved to be not onely unwarrantable, but likewise so hurtful to the churches, that church-reformation cannot with any comfort go forward, so long as such separation is tolerated. Also an humble request presented to the congregational divines, that since the differences between them and the classical-divines are very small they would please to strike in with the classical-divines in carrying on the worke of reformation, before the inundation of these corrupt opinions, have destroyed both ordinances and religion. / By Gi. Firmin minister to the church in Shalford in essex.

Firmin, Giles, 1614-1697.

January 1652

[12], 111, [1] p.Annotation on Thomason copy: "March. 15. 1651."; also the last number of the imprin...

A necessitie of separation from the Church of England, prooved by the nonconformists principles Specially opposed vnto Dr. Ames, his Fresh suit against humane ceremonies, in the point of separation only. Also Dr. Laiton, Mr. Dayrel, and Mr. Bradshaw, are here answered, wherein they have written against us. With a table in the later end, of the principal occurrents in this treatise. By Iohn Canne, pastor of the ancient English church, in Amsterdam.

Canne, John, d. 1667?

January 1634

[8], 264, [12] p.In part a reply to: Ames, William. A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's ...

A resolution of two cases of conscience in two discourses : the first, Of the lawfulness of compliance with all the ceremonies of the Church of England : the second, Of the necessity of the use of common-prayer in publick.

Francklin, John, d. 1689.

January 1683

[4], 36 p.Attributed by John Francklin. Cf. Halkett & Laing (2nd ed.)Reproduction of original in the...

Puritan Jurisprudence: A Study In Substantive Biblical Law

G. Joseph Gatis
Copyright George
Joseph Gatis

March 2015

Puritanism was a inter-denominational movement to continue the Calvinistic Reformation in the United...

An answer to two treatises of Mr. Iohn Can, the leader of the English Brownists in Amsterdam the former called, A necessitie of separation from the Church of England, proved by the Nonconformists principles : the other, A stay against straying : wherein in opposition to M. Iohn Robinson, he undertakes to prove the unlawfulnesse of hearing the ministers of the Church of England ... / by the late learned, laborious and faithfull servant of Jesus Christ, John Ball.

Ball, John, 1585-1640.
Ashe, Simeon, d. 1662.

January 1642

[23], 144, 92, [3] p.Edited by Simeon Ashe.Errata: p. [3] at end.Reproduction of original in Yale Un...

A stop to the course of separation, or, The separation of the new separatists from the parish churches condemned by a sober answer to the chief pleas for this disordrely practise : wherein is discovered how contrary it is, 1. To the Holy Scriptures, 2. To the reason of the thing, 3. To the judgement of the old nonconformists, 4. To themselves heretofore.

Lamb, Thomas, d. 1686.

January 1672

[8], 160 p.Errata: prelim. p. [8].Reproduction of original in Bristol Public Library, Bristol, Engla...

A common apologie of the Church of England against the vniust challenges of the ouer-iust sect, commonly called Brownists. Wherein the grounds and defences, of the separation are largely discussed: occasioned, by a late pamphlet published vnder the name, of an answer to a censorious epistle, which the reader shall finde in the margent. By I.H.

Hall, Joseph, 1574-1656.
Robinson, John, 1575?-1625. Answer to a censorious epistle.

January 1610

[6], 145, [5] p.Dedication signed: Ios. Hall.A reprinting of and reply to: "An answer to a censoriou...

The recantation of a Brownist. Or A reformed puritan. Written by one that hath altogether, bin led in the same erronious oppinions for many yeeres together: and now since his conuersion, hath measured the pretended holy discipline, by pastors, doctors, elders and deacons, (which the disciplinarian malecontents would obtrude vpon our Church,) and hath found it far shorter, then the discipline vsed either in the primitiue Church, or in this our Church of England: if all antiquitie be not reiected

Fairlambe, Peter.

January 1606

[60] p.Dedication signed: Peter Fairlambe.Printer's name from STC.Signatures: A-G⁴ H² .The first lea...

New England Puritans: “the Lord’s FREE People”

Susana M. Jiménez Placer
Universidad De
Santiago De Compostela

February 2015

The relationship between Puritanism and the concept of liberty has been controversial since the very...

The case of mixt communion whether it be lawful to separate from a church upon the account of promiscuous congregations and mixt communions?

Freeman, Samuel, 1643-1700.

January 1683

[2], 41, [1] p.Written by Samuel Freeman. Cf. NUC pre-1956.Advertisement on p. [1] at end.Reproduct...

A rational defence of non-conformity wherein the practice of nonconformists is vindicated from promoting popery, and ruining the church, imputed to them by Dr. Stillingfleet in his Unreasonableness of separation : also his arguments from the principles and way of the reformers, and first dissenters are answered : and the case of the present separation, truly stated, and the blame of it laid where it ought to be : and the way to union among Protestants is pointed at / by Gilbert Rule ...

Rule, Gilbert, 1629?-1701.

January 1689

[12], 276 [i.e. 284] p.Reproduction of original in Dr. Williams' Library, London, England

A serious address to the members of the Episcopal separation in New-England. Occasioned by Mr. Wetmore's Vindication of the professors of the Church of England in Connecticut. : Being an attempt to fix and settle these three points, I. Whether the inhabitants of the British plantations in America, those of New-England in particular, are obliged, in point of duty, by the laws of God or man, to conform to the prelatic church, by law established in the south part of Great Britain. II. Whether it be proper in point of prudence for those who are already settled in such churches as have so long subsisted in New-England, to forsake them and go over to that communion. III. Whether it be lawful for particular members of New-England churches to separate from them, and join in communion with the Episcopal assemblies in the country. / By Noah Hobart, A.M. Pastor of the Church of Christ in Fairfield. ; [Two lines from Proverbs]

Hobart, Noah, 1706-1773.

January 1748

139, [1] p. ; 18 cm. (8vo)Half-title: Mr. Hobart's serious address to the members of the Episcopal ...

The vnreasonablenesse of the separation Made apparant, by an examination of Mr. Iohnsons pretended reasons, published an. 1608. Wherby hee laboureth to iustifie his schisme from the church assemblies of England.

Bradshaw, William, 1571-1618.
Ames, William, 1576-1633. Manudicition for Mr. Robinson.

January 1614

[128] p.By William Bradshaw. Includes: Ames, William. A manudiction for Mr. Robinson."The unreasonab...

Jerubbaal justified: or, A plain rebuke of the high (pretended humble) remonstrance and plea against Mr. Crofton his reformation not separation or, a plea for communion with the church under those corruptions, and by that disorderly ministration, to which he cannot conform, nor by it administer. Demonstrating, T.P. (alias D.) his grosse mistakes of Mr. Crofton his principle and argument: as also the fallacie and vanity of his pleaded necessity for his (confessed) separation from publique assemblies, which is found insufficient to acquit him of schisme. To which is added a position, disputing the lawfulnesse of ministers receiving an imposed liturgy.

R. S.
Crofton, Zachary, 1625 or 6-1672. Reformation not separation.

January 1663

[10], 43, [1] p.A reply to Crofton's Reformation not separation.This is a replacement for incomplete...

The unreasonablnes of the separation made apparent, in an examination of, and answere to, certaine reasons of Maister Francis Johnson: whereby he laboureth to justifie his schisme from the church assemblies of England; By Maister VVilliam Bradshaw deceased. Together with a rejoinder, in defence of the said answere against the late reply of Maister Iohn Canne (a leader to a company of Brownists in Amsterdam) thereunto, by a freind [sic] of the deceased.

Bradshaw, William, 1571-1618.

January 1640

[8], 149, [1] p.Another edition, revised, of part 1 of STC 3532, which answers Francis Johnson's "Ce...

Separation examined: or, a treatise vvherein the grounds for separation from the ministry and churches of England are weighed, and found too light. The practise proved to be not onely unwarrantable, but likewise so hurtful to the churches, that church-reformation cannot with any comfort go forward, so long as such separation is tolerated. Also an humble request presented to the congregational divines, that since the differences between them and the classical-divines are very small they would please to strike in with the classical-divines in carrying on the worke of reformation, before the inundation of these corrupt opinions, have destroyed both ordinances and religion. / By Gi. Firmin minister to the church in Shalford in essex.

Firmin, Giles, 1614-1697.

January 1652

[12], 111, [1] p.Annotation on Thomason copy: "March. 15. 1651."; also the last number of the imprin...

A necessitie of separation from the Church of England, prooved by the nonconformists principles Specially opposed vnto Dr. Ames, his Fresh suit against humane ceremonies, in the point of separation only. Also Dr. Laiton, Mr. Dayrel, and Mr. Bradshaw, are here answered, wherein they have written against us. With a table in the later end, of the principal occurrents in this treatise. By Iohn Canne, pastor of the ancient English church, in Amsterdam.

Canne, John, d. 1667?

January 1634

[8], 264, [12] p.In part a reply to: Ames, William. A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's ...

A resolution of two cases of conscience in two discourses : the first, Of the lawfulness of compliance with all the ceremonies of the Church of England : the second, Of the necessity of the use of common-prayer in publick.

Francklin, John, d. 1689.

January 1683

[4], 36 p.Attributed by John Francklin. Cf. Halkett & Laing (2nd ed.)Reproduction of original in the...

Puritan Jurisprudence: A Study In Substantive Biblical Law

G. Joseph Gatis
Copyright George
Joseph Gatis

March 2015

Puritanism was a inter-denominational movement to continue the Calvinistic Reformation in the United...

An answer to two treatises of Mr. Iohn Can, the leader of the English Brownists in Amsterdam the former called, A necessitie of separation from the Church of England, proved by the Nonconformists principles : the other, A stay against straying : wherein in opposition to M. Iohn Robinson, he undertakes to prove the unlawfulnesse of hearing the ministers of the Church of England ... / by the late learned, laborious and faithfull servant of Jesus Christ, John Ball.

Ball, John, 1585-1640.
Ashe, Simeon, d. 1662.

January 1642

[23], 144, 92, [3] p.Edited by Simeon Ashe.Errata: p. [3] at end.Reproduction of original in Yale Un...

A stop to the course of separation, or, The separation of the new separatists from the parish churches condemned by a sober answer to the chief pleas for this disordrely practise : wherein is discovered how contrary it is, 1. To the Holy Scriptures, 2. To the reason of the thing, 3. To the judgement of the old nonconformists, 4. To themselves heretofore.

Lamb, Thomas, d. 1686.

January 1672

[8], 160 p.Errata: prelim. p. [8].Reproduction of original in Bristol Public Library, Bristol, Engla...

A common apologie of the Church of England against the vniust challenges of the ouer-iust sect, commonly called Brownists. Wherein the grounds and defences, of the separation are largely discussed: occasioned, by a late pamphlet published vnder the name, of an answer to a censorious epistle, which the reader shall finde in the margent. By I.H.

Hall, Joseph, 1574-1656.
Robinson, John, 1575?-1625. Answer to a censorious epistle.

January 1610

[6], 145, [5] p.Dedication signed: Ios. Hall.A reprinting of and reply to: "An answer to a censoriou...

The recantation of a Brownist. Or A reformed puritan. Written by one that hath altogether, bin led in the same erronious oppinions for many yeeres together: and now since his conuersion, hath measured the pretended holy discipline, by pastors, doctors, elders and deacons, (which the disciplinarian malecontents would obtrude vpon our Church,) and hath found it far shorter, then the discipline vsed either in the primitiue Church, or in this our Church of England: if all antiquitie be not reiected

Fairlambe, Peter.

January 1606

[60] p.Dedication signed: Peter Fairlambe.Printer's name from STC.Signatures: A-G⁴ H² .The first lea...

New England Puritans: “the Lord’s FREE People”

Susana M. Jiménez Placer
Universidad De
Santiago De Compostela

February 2015

The relationship between Puritanism and the concept of liberty has been controversial since the very...

The case of mixt communion whether it be lawful to separate from a church upon the account of promiscuous congregations and mixt communions?

Freeman, Samuel, 1643-1700.

January 1683

[2], 41, [1] p.Written by Samuel Freeman. Cf. NUC pre-1956.Advertisement on p. [1] at end.Reproduct...

A rational defence of non-conformity wherein the practice of nonconformists is vindicated from promoting popery, and ruining the church, imputed to them by Dr. Stillingfleet in his Unreasonableness of separation : also his arguments from the principles and way of the reformers, and first dissenters are answered : and the case of the present separation, truly stated, and the blame of it laid where it ought to be : and the way to union among Protestants is pointed at / by Gilbert Rule ...

Rule, Gilbert, 1629?-1701.

January 1689

[12], 276 [i.e. 284] p.Reproduction of original in Dr. Williams' Library, London, England

A serious address to the members of the Episcopal separation in New-England. Occasioned by Mr. Wetmore's Vindication of the professors of the Church of England in Connecticut. : Being an attempt to fix and settle these three points, I. Whether the inhabitants of the British plantations in America, those of New-England in particular, are obliged, in point of duty, by the laws of God or man, to conform to the prelatic church, by law established in the south part of Great Britain. II. Whether it be proper in point of prudence for those who are already settled in such churches as have so long subsisted in New-England, to forsake them and go over to that communion. III. Whether it be lawful for particular members of New-England churches to separate from them, and join in communion with the Episcopal assemblies in the country. / By Noah Hobart, A.M. Pastor of the Church of Christ in Fairfield. ; [Two lines from Proverbs]

Hobart, Noah, 1706-1773.

January 1748

139, [1] p. ; 18 cm. (8vo)Half-title: Mr. Hobart's serious address to the members of the Episcopal ...

The vnreasonablenesse of the separation Made apparant, by an examination of Mr. Iohnsons pretended reasons, published an. 1608. Wherby hee laboureth to iustifie his schisme from the church assemblies of England.

Bradshaw, William, 1571-1618.
Ames, William, 1576-1633. Manudicition for Mr. Robinson.

January 1614

[128] p.By William Bradshaw. Includes: Ames, William. A manudiction for Mr. Robinson."The unreasonab...

Jerubbaal justified: or, A plain rebuke of the high (pretended humble) remonstrance and plea against Mr. Crofton his reformation not separation or, a plea for communion with the church under those corruptions, and by that disorderly ministration, to which he cannot conform, nor by it administer. Demonstrating, T.P. (alias D.) his grosse mistakes of Mr. Crofton his principle and argument: as also the fallacie and vanity of his pleaded necessity for his (confessed) separation from publique assemblies, which is found insufficient to acquit him of schisme. To which is added a position, disputing the lawfulnesse of ministers receiving an imposed liturgy.

R. S.
Crofton, Zachary, 1625 or 6-1672. Reformation not separation.

January 1663

[10], 43, [1] p.A reply to Crofton's Reformation not separation.This is a replacement for incomplete...

Abstract

Extracted data

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items