Add to ORKGWhat happened to make for the factor of 16 were new ideas, what Mokyr calls “industrial Enlightenment.” But the Scientific Revolution did not suffice. Non-Europeans like the Chinese outstripped the West in science until quite late. Britain did not lead in science---yet clearly did in technology. Indeed, applied technology depended on science only a little even in 1900.scientific revolution, science, technology, industrial enlightenment, applied technology
Did breakthroughs in core processes during the Industrial Revolution tend to generate further innova...
The Industrial Revolution was the transition to new manufacturing processes that occurred in the per...
The available statistics show that there was a sharp acceleration of the growth of British industria...
What happened to make for the factor of 16 were new ideas, what Mokyr calls “industrial Enlightenmen...
Britain was first, though the classical (and many of the neoclassical) economists did not recognize ...
No viable account of the rise of the modern world in 19th century Europe can do without an account o...
Two centuries ago the world’s economy stood at the present level of Chad. Two centuries later the wo...
Real national income per head in Britain rose by a factor of about 16 from the 18th century to the p...
It is a materialist prejudice common in scholarship from 1890 to 1980 that economic results must hav...
1There has been a debate about the breadth of technological progress during the industrial revolutio...
1There has been a debate about the breadth of technological progress during the industrial revolutio...
The Scientific Revolution represents a turning point in the history of humanity. Yet it remains ill-...
An extreme materialist hypothesis explaining the Industrial Revolution would be simply genetic. Gre...
The issue of the emergence of Modern Economic growth in the nineteenth-century West has once again r...
I am grateful to Marianne Hinds and Michael Silver for loyal and competent research assistance. The ...
Did breakthroughs in core processes during the Industrial Revolution tend to generate further innova...
The Industrial Revolution was the transition to new manufacturing processes that occurred in the per...
The available statistics show that there was a sharp acceleration of the growth of British industria...
What happened to make for the factor of 16 were new ideas, what Mokyr calls “industrial Enlightenmen...
Britain was first, though the classical (and many of the neoclassical) economists did not recognize ...
No viable account of the rise of the modern world in 19th century Europe can do without an account o...
Two centuries ago the world’s economy stood at the present level of Chad. Two centuries later the wo...
Real national income per head in Britain rose by a factor of about 16 from the 18th century to the p...
It is a materialist prejudice common in scholarship from 1890 to 1980 that economic results must hav...
1There has been a debate about the breadth of technological progress during the industrial revolutio...
1There has been a debate about the breadth of technological progress during the industrial revolutio...
The Scientific Revolution represents a turning point in the history of humanity. Yet it remains ill-...
An extreme materialist hypothesis explaining the Industrial Revolution would be simply genetic. Gre...
The issue of the emergence of Modern Economic growth in the nineteenth-century West has once again r...
I am grateful to Marianne Hinds and Michael Silver for loyal and competent research assistance. The ...
Did breakthroughs in core processes during the Industrial Revolution tend to generate further innova...
The Industrial Revolution was the transition to new manufacturing processes that occurred in the per...
The available statistics show that there was a sharp acceleration of the growth of British industria...