The US Merger Guidelines consider that the anticompetitive effect of a horizontal merger is increasing in the initial market concentration and decreasing in the elasticity of demand. These ideas are studied in a setting where identical firms compete à la Cournot and marginal cost is constant. The former relationship holds if demand is convex, but it may fail to be true if demand is concave. The latter one only holds if the elasticity of demand is increasing in the degree of concavity. This condition is satisfied by linear demands, constant elasticity demands and demands that are log -linear in price.Mergers, market power, antitrust
Competition authorities sometimes require that firms divest some of their assets to rivalsin order t...
As members of the ABA Antitrust Section\u27s Task Force on Fundamental Theory, we are pleased to pro...
Abstract: The inherent dynamic competitiveness of the new economy brings about novel challenges to a...
When should the government challenge a merger that might increase market power but also generate eff...
In August, 2010, the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission issued new Guidelines for a...
In imperfectly competitive markets firms with high costs produce positive output. The market's abili...
We propose a simple, new test for making an initial determination of whether a proposed merger betwe...
The antitrust regulator often imposes a merger remedy on a horizontally merged firm in order to remo...
This thesis discusses the welfare effects of horizontal mergers and firms' incentives to merge. More...
New Horizontal Merger Guidelines were issued jointly by the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade...
This paper provides an example of a methodology for evaluating the potential ‘coordinated effects ’ ...
We reexamine the profitability and social efficiency of horizontal mergers in a Cournot oligopoly wi...
The antitrust enforcement Agencies\u27 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines introduce a nontechnical appl...
Topics in antitrust theory, empirical analysis, and policy are examined, with an application to the ...
We analyze the optimal policy of an antitrust authority towards horizontal mergers when merger propo...
Competition authorities sometimes require that firms divest some of their assets to rivalsin order t...
As members of the ABA Antitrust Section\u27s Task Force on Fundamental Theory, we are pleased to pro...
Abstract: The inherent dynamic competitiveness of the new economy brings about novel challenges to a...
When should the government challenge a merger that might increase market power but also generate eff...
In August, 2010, the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission issued new Guidelines for a...
In imperfectly competitive markets firms with high costs produce positive output. The market's abili...
We propose a simple, new test for making an initial determination of whether a proposed merger betwe...
The antitrust regulator often imposes a merger remedy on a horizontally merged firm in order to remo...
This thesis discusses the welfare effects of horizontal mergers and firms' incentives to merge. More...
New Horizontal Merger Guidelines were issued jointly by the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade...
This paper provides an example of a methodology for evaluating the potential ‘coordinated effects ’ ...
We reexamine the profitability and social efficiency of horizontal mergers in a Cournot oligopoly wi...
The antitrust enforcement Agencies\u27 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines introduce a nontechnical appl...
Topics in antitrust theory, empirical analysis, and policy are examined, with an application to the ...
We analyze the optimal policy of an antitrust authority towards horizontal mergers when merger propo...
Competition authorities sometimes require that firms divest some of their assets to rivalsin order t...
As members of the ABA Antitrust Section\u27s Task Force on Fundamental Theory, we are pleased to pro...
Abstract: The inherent dynamic competitiveness of the new economy brings about novel challenges to a...