The incompatibility between the Pareto indifference criterion and a concern for greater equality in living standards of heterogenous populations (see, amongst others, Ebert, 1995, 1997, Ebert and Moyes, 2003 and Shorrocks, 1995) might come as a surprise, since both principles are reconcilable when people differ only in income (homogenous population). We present two families of welfare rankings --(i) single parameter extensions of the generalized Lorenz dominance rule and (ii) a subset of Weymark's (1981) generalized Ginis-- and show how and why these rules resolve the paradox.Heterogeneity; Welfare comparisons;
Cataloged from PDF version of report.Includes bibliographical references (page 14-15).This paper exa...
La Mesure des Inégalités Ordinales et MultidimensionnellesCHALLENGING INEQUALITIES: A INDO-EUROPEAN ...
Abstract We propose a straightforward dominance procedure for comparing social welfare orderings (SW...
The incompatibility between the Pareto indifference criterion and a concern for greater equality in ...
On comparing heterogenous populations: Is there really a conflict between the Pareto criterion and i...
Some analysts use sequential dominance criteria, and others use equivalence scales in combination wi...
The paper considers the problem of comparing income distributions for heterogeneous populations. The...
This paper establishes the principles which should govern the welfare and inequality analysis of het...
Comparisons of Heterogeneous Distributions and dominance Criteria by Patrick Moyes This paper look...
Consider an income distribution among households of the same size in which individuals, equally need...
We extend standard Pareto criterion for welfare ranking in terms of inequality. We suggest strongly...
We provide a characterization of the generalised satisfaction -- in our terminology non-deprivation ...
We apply recently proposed individual welfare measures in the context of preference heterogeneity, d...
Is one distribution (of income, consumption, or some other economic variable) among families or indi...
We propose a straightforward dominance procedure for comparing social welfare orderings (swos) with ...
Cataloged from PDF version of report.Includes bibliographical references (page 14-15).This paper exa...
La Mesure des Inégalités Ordinales et MultidimensionnellesCHALLENGING INEQUALITIES: A INDO-EUROPEAN ...
Abstract We propose a straightforward dominance procedure for comparing social welfare orderings (SW...
The incompatibility between the Pareto indifference criterion and a concern for greater equality in ...
On comparing heterogenous populations: Is there really a conflict between the Pareto criterion and i...
Some analysts use sequential dominance criteria, and others use equivalence scales in combination wi...
The paper considers the problem of comparing income distributions for heterogeneous populations. The...
This paper establishes the principles which should govern the welfare and inequality analysis of het...
Comparisons of Heterogeneous Distributions and dominance Criteria by Patrick Moyes This paper look...
Consider an income distribution among households of the same size in which individuals, equally need...
We extend standard Pareto criterion for welfare ranking in terms of inequality. We suggest strongly...
We provide a characterization of the generalised satisfaction -- in our terminology non-deprivation ...
We apply recently proposed individual welfare measures in the context of preference heterogeneity, d...
Is one distribution (of income, consumption, or some other economic variable) among families or indi...
We propose a straightforward dominance procedure for comparing social welfare orderings (swos) with ...
Cataloged from PDF version of report.Includes bibliographical references (page 14-15).This paper exa...
La Mesure des Inégalités Ordinales et MultidimensionnellesCHALLENGING INEQUALITIES: A INDO-EUROPEAN ...
Abstract We propose a straightforward dominance procedure for comparing social welfare orderings (SW...