Add to ORKGIn her opening contribution to this symposium, Mary Morgan has provided a critical evaluation of Marshall's Tendencies in which she reviews a series of methodological issues. She characterizes my views quite accurately, while pinpointing the gaps in my account (most notably in relation to pinning down what is meant by a ‘mechanism’). I am therefore going to leave this aspect of things on one side, and turn to other matters.
In his lecture at the Conférence des Annales, Russel W. COOPER raises issues that certainly will bec...
Alfred Marshall’s approach to economics hides a paradox. On one hand, the ‘father’ of neoclassical e...
I am grateful to Jerry Epstein and Jennifer Taub for comments on a previous draft, and especially to...
In her opening contribution to this symposium, Mary Morgan has provided a critical evaluation of Mar...
Through most of the history of economics, the most influential commentators on methodology were also...
Michel and I both agree that the correct interpretation of Keynes’s work involves seeing Keynes as a...
Alfred Marshall remains somewhat of an enigmatic figure in the evolution of economic analysis. Histo...
The papers prepared for this symposium cover a great deal of ground. It is a pleasure to be able to ...
Original paper can be found at: http://www.fep.up.pt/conferencias/eaepe2007/Both Alfred Marshall and...
From page 1 -- 'John Kay’s thought-provoking essay1 argues that economists have been led astray by e...
We examine Ralph W. Souter\u27s defence, in the 1930s, of Marshall\u27s Principles against Robbins\u...
Milton Friedman is usually regarded as an instrumentalist on the basis of his infamous claim that ec...
This paper contains commentary on the chapter “Simulation and Estimation of Hedonic Models” by Heckm...
Angrist and Pischke highlight one aspect of the research that has positively transformed econometric...
This note critically evaluates the New Classical Macroeconomics from a Marshallian perspective. Revi...
In his lecture at the Conférence des Annales, Russel W. COOPER raises issues that certainly will bec...
Alfred Marshall’s approach to economics hides a paradox. On one hand, the ‘father’ of neoclassical e...
I am grateful to Jerry Epstein and Jennifer Taub for comments on a previous draft, and especially to...
In her opening contribution to this symposium, Mary Morgan has provided a critical evaluation of Mar...
Through most of the history of economics, the most influential commentators on methodology were also...
Michel and I both agree that the correct interpretation of Keynes’s work involves seeing Keynes as a...
Alfred Marshall remains somewhat of an enigmatic figure in the evolution of economic analysis. Histo...
The papers prepared for this symposium cover a great deal of ground. It is a pleasure to be able to ...
Original paper can be found at: http://www.fep.up.pt/conferencias/eaepe2007/Both Alfred Marshall and...
From page 1 -- 'John Kay’s thought-provoking essay1 argues that economists have been led astray by e...
We examine Ralph W. Souter\u27s defence, in the 1930s, of Marshall\u27s Principles against Robbins\u...
Milton Friedman is usually regarded as an instrumentalist on the basis of his infamous claim that ec...
This paper contains commentary on the chapter “Simulation and Estimation of Hedonic Models” by Heckm...
Angrist and Pischke highlight one aspect of the research that has positively transformed econometric...
This note critically evaluates the New Classical Macroeconomics from a Marshallian perspective. Revi...
In his lecture at the Conférence des Annales, Russel W. COOPER raises issues that certainly will bec...
Alfred Marshall’s approach to economics hides a paradox. On one hand, the ‘father’ of neoclassical e...
I am grateful to Jerry Epstein and Jennifer Taub for comments on a previous draft, and especially to...