In this paper we show the consequences of applying a panel unit root test that assumes independence between the cross-sections when testing for a purchasing power parity relationship. The distribution of the tests investigated, including the IPS test of Im et al (2003), are influenced by a common stochastic trend which is usually not accounted for. The result is that the empirical size tends to one with the number of cross-sections. Hence, it is of crucial importance to account for this cross-sectional dependency.
Panel unit root tests of real exchange rates – as opposed to univariate tests – usually reject non-s...
Abstract Most previous, researchers did carry out with cross-sectional dependence (CSD) on panel un...
Applying the new panel unit root test developed in this article, we can overcome the pitfalls of old...
In this paper we show the consequences of applying a panel unit root test that assumes independence ...
A common finding in the empirical literature on the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) is tha...
This paper reviews recent developments in the analysis of non-stationary panels, focusing on empiric...
A common finding in the empirical literature on the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) is tha...
Abstract: This paper re-assesses the panel (unit root test) evidence for PPP on four monthly data se...
Abstract: This paper re-assesses the panel (unit root test) evidence for PPP on four monthly data se...
Doubts have been raised recently on the findings of panel studies of purchasing power parity (PPP) o...
Doubts have been raised recently on the findings of panel studies of purchasing power parity (PPP) o...
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel appro...
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel appro...
Doubts have been raised recently on the findings of panel studies of purchasing power parity (PPP) o...
Abstract: This paper reviews panel unit root and cointegration tests in the context of PPP. It highl...
Panel unit root tests of real exchange rates – as opposed to univariate tests – usually reject non-s...
Abstract Most previous, researchers did carry out with cross-sectional dependence (CSD) on panel un...
Applying the new panel unit root test developed in this article, we can overcome the pitfalls of old...
In this paper we show the consequences of applying a panel unit root test that assumes independence ...
A common finding in the empirical literature on the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) is tha...
This paper reviews recent developments in the analysis of non-stationary panels, focusing on empiric...
A common finding in the empirical literature on the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) is tha...
Abstract: This paper re-assesses the panel (unit root test) evidence for PPP on four monthly data se...
Abstract: This paper re-assesses the panel (unit root test) evidence for PPP on four monthly data se...
Doubts have been raised recently on the findings of panel studies of purchasing power parity (PPP) o...
Doubts have been raised recently on the findings of panel studies of purchasing power parity (PPP) o...
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel appro...
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel appro...
Doubts have been raised recently on the findings of panel studies of purchasing power parity (PPP) o...
Abstract: This paper reviews panel unit root and cointegration tests in the context of PPP. It highl...
Panel unit root tests of real exchange rates – as opposed to univariate tests – usually reject non-s...
Abstract Most previous, researchers did carry out with cross-sectional dependence (CSD) on panel un...
Applying the new panel unit root test developed in this article, we can overcome the pitfalls of old...