Why me? Attributions and adjustment by cancer patients and their mates at two stages in the disease process

This research investigated how cancer patients at early and advanced stage disease (N = 73) and their mates (N = 39) attributed causality for the disease, their levels of adjustment and the relationship between attributions and adjustment. Data were collected through semi-structured home interviews. Results indicated that the largest numbers of individuals cited chance as the cause of the cancer, although many reported that they had not asked themselves the question, 'Why me?'. Adjustment measures indicated, in general, more similarities than differences between groups. Attributions were not significant predictors of adjustment. It is suggested that not making strong causal attributions may be adaptive for cancer patients and their families.