Romanism discussed, or, An answer to the nine first articles of H.T. his Manual of controversies. Whereby is manifested, that H.T. hath not (as he pretends) clearly demonstrated the truth of the Roman religion by him falsly called Catholick, by texts of holy scripture, councils of all ages, Fathers of the first five hundred years, common sense, and experience, nor fully answered the principal objections of protestants, whom he unjustly terms sectaries. By John Tombes, B.D. And commended to the world by Mr. Richard Baxter.

The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion.

Bell, Thomas, fl. 1593-1610.

January 1610

[20], 419, [1] p.Dedication signed: Thomas Bell.A response to: Woodward, Philip. Bels trial examined...

A catholike appeale for Protestants, out of the confessions of the Romane doctors particularly answering the mis-named Catholike apologie for the Romane faith, out of the Protestants: manifesting the antiquitie of our religion, and satisfying all scrupulous obiections which haue bene vrged against it. Written by Th. Morton Doctor of Diuinitie.

Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659.

January 1609

[24], 680, [20] p.A reply to: Anderton, Lawrence. The Protestants apologie for the Roman Church.Pri...

The XXXVI questions propounded for resolution of unlearned Protestants in matter of religion to the doctors of the prelaticall pretended reformed-Church of England, retorted for resolution on unlearned papists in matter of religion, to V.H. and V.N. doctors of the pretended Catholick Church of Rome / by T. Svvadlin ...

Swadlin, Thomas, 1600-1670.

[2], 59 p.Imperfect: stained, with loss of print.Reproduction of original in the Union Theological S...

A manuel of controversies clearly demonstrating the truth of Catholique religion by texts of Holy Scripture, councils of all ages, Fathers of the first 500 yeers, common sense and reason, and fully answering the principal objections of Protestants and all other sectaries / by H.T.

Turberville, Henry, d. 1678.

January 1654

[11], 414 p.Reproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

An answer to the most materiall parts of Dr. Hamond's booke of schisme: or a defence of the Church of England, against exceptions of the Romanists written in a letter from a Catholique gent. to his friend in England.

B. P.

January 1654

28 p.Signed and dated at end: B.P. Brussels the 30 March, 1654.A reply to: Hammond, Henry. Of schis...

The church of Rome not sufficiently defended from her apostacy, heresie, and schisme as appears by an answer to certain quæries, printed in a book entituled Fiat Lux, and sent transcribed (as 'tis suppos'd) from thence by a Romanist to a priest of the Church of England. Whereunto are annexed the Romanist's reply to the Protestant's Answer, and the Protestant's rejoynder to that reply. By P.S. D.D.

Samways, Peter, 1615-1693.

January 1663

[18], 9-49, [2], 50-96 p.P.S. = Peter Samways.With imprimatur statement on A1v dated: Aprill, 14. 16...

A parænesis. Or, Seasonable exhortatory to all true sons of the Church of England. Wherein is inserted a discourse of hæresy in defence of our Church against the Romanist. / By H. Hammond. D.D.

Hammond, Henry, 1605-1660.

240 [i.e. 236], [4] p.With two final advertisement and errata leaves.P. 236 misnumbered 240.Annotati...

A iust and moderate answer to a most iniurious, and slaunderous pamphlet, intituled, An exact discouery of Romish doctrine in case of conspiracie and rebellion Wherein the innocency of Catholike religion is proued, and euery obiection returned vpon the Protestant accuser, and his owne profession. With licence of superior.

Broughton, Richard.

[64] p.By Richard Broughton.A reply to the work by Thomas Morton.Imprint from STC.Signatures: A² a²...

The truth and certainty of the Protestant faith with a short and plain account of the doctrine of the Romish Church in its visible opposition to Scripture and the very being of Christianity : to which is adjoined some serious considerations anent popery & the state of that controversy.

Fleming, Robert, 1630-1694.

January 1678

[6], 55 p.Attributed to Robert Fleming. Cf. Halkett & Laing (2nd ed.) Sometimes erroneously attribut...

A short summary of the principal controversies between the Church of England, and the church of Rome being a vindication of several Protestant doctrines, in answer to a late pamphlet intituled, Protestancy destitute of Scripture-proofs.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1687

[10], 150, [4] p.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.Attributed to William Sherlock. cf. ...

A second discourse in vindication of the Protestant grounds of faith, against the pretence of infallibility in the Roman Church in answer to The guide in controversies by R.H., Protestancy without principles, and Reason and religion, or, The certain rule of faith by E.W. : with a particular enquiry into the miracles of the Roman Church / by Edward Stillingfleet ...

Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699.

January 1673

[15], 295-695, [3] p.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library and Duke University Library.Form...

A direct answer vnto the scandalous exceptions, which Theophilus Higgons hath lately obiected against D. Morton In the which there is principally discussed, two of the most notorious obiections vsed by the Romanists, viz. 1. M. Luthers conference with the diuell, and 2. The sence of the article of Christ his descension into hell.

Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659.

January 1609

[6], 31, [1] p.By Thomas Morton.A reply to: Theophilus Higgons. The first motive of T.H. Maister of...

A iust and temperate defence of the fiue books of ecclesiastical policie: written by M. Richard Hooker against an vncharitable letter of certain English Protestants (as they tearme themselues) crauing resolution, in some matters of doctrine, which seeme to ouerthrow the foundation of religion, and the Church amongst vs. Written by William Covel Doctor in Diuinitie, and published by authority. The contents whereof are in the page following.

Covell, William, d. 1614?

January 1603

[8], 154 [i.e. 152] p.A reply to: A Christian letter of certaine English protestants, unfained favou...

A defense of the sincere and true translations of the holie Scriptures into the English tong against the manifolde cauils, friuolous quarels, and impudent slaunders of Gregorie Martin, one of the readers of popish diuinitie in the trayterous Seminarie of Rhemes. By William Fvlke D. in Diuinitie, and M. of Pembroke haule in Cambridge. Wherevnto is added a briefe confutation of all such quarrels & cauils, as haue bene of late vttered by diuerse papistes in their English pamphlets, against the writings of the saide William Fvlke.

Fulke, William, 1538-1589.

[4], 95, [1]; 144, 147-514, 517-532, [4]; 71, [1] p.A reprinting of and reply to: Martin, Gregory. ...

Two short discourses against the Romanists by Henry Dodwell ...

Dodwell, Henry, 1641-1711.

January 1676

[88], 31, 21, 120 [1] p.Each part has special title page.Reproduction of original in Cambridge Unive...

The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion.

Bell, Thomas, fl. 1593-1610.

January 1610

[20], 419, [1] p.Dedication signed: Thomas Bell.A response to: Woodward, Philip. Bels trial examined...

A catholike appeale for Protestants, out of the confessions of the Romane doctors particularly answering the mis-named Catholike apologie for the Romane faith, out of the Protestants: manifesting the antiquitie of our religion, and satisfying all scrupulous obiections which haue bene vrged against it. Written by Th. Morton Doctor of Diuinitie.

Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659.

January 1609

[24], 680, [20] p.A reply to: Anderton, Lawrence. The Protestants apologie for the Roman Church.Pri...

The XXXVI questions propounded for resolution of unlearned Protestants in matter of religion to the doctors of the prelaticall pretended reformed-Church of England, retorted for resolution on unlearned papists in matter of religion, to V.H. and V.N. doctors of the pretended Catholick Church of Rome / by T. Svvadlin ...

Swadlin, Thomas, 1600-1670.

[2], 59 p.Imperfect: stained, with loss of print.Reproduction of original in the Union Theological S...

A manuel of controversies clearly demonstrating the truth of Catholique religion by texts of Holy Scripture, councils of all ages, Fathers of the first 500 yeers, common sense and reason, and fully answering the principal objections of Protestants and all other sectaries / by H.T.

Turberville, Henry, d. 1678.

January 1654

[11], 414 p.Reproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

An answer to the most materiall parts of Dr. Hamond's booke of schisme: or a defence of the Church of England, against exceptions of the Romanists written in a letter from a Catholique gent. to his friend in England.

B. P.

January 1654

28 p.Signed and dated at end: B.P. Brussels the 30 March, 1654.A reply to: Hammond, Henry. Of schis...

The church of Rome not sufficiently defended from her apostacy, heresie, and schisme as appears by an answer to certain quæries, printed in a book entituled Fiat Lux, and sent transcribed (as 'tis suppos'd) from thence by a Romanist to a priest of the Church of England. Whereunto are annexed the Romanist's reply to the Protestant's Answer, and the Protestant's rejoynder to that reply. By P.S. D.D.

Samways, Peter, 1615-1693.

January 1663

[18], 9-49, [2], 50-96 p.P.S. = Peter Samways.With imprimatur statement on A1v dated: Aprill, 14. 16...

A parænesis. Or, Seasonable exhortatory to all true sons of the Church of England. Wherein is inserted a discourse of hæresy in defence of our Church against the Romanist. / By H. Hammond. D.D.

Hammond, Henry, 1605-1660.

240 [i.e. 236], [4] p.With two final advertisement and errata leaves.P. 236 misnumbered 240.Annotati...

A iust and moderate answer to a most iniurious, and slaunderous pamphlet, intituled, An exact discouery of Romish doctrine in case of conspiracie and rebellion Wherein the innocency of Catholike religion is proued, and euery obiection returned vpon the Protestant accuser, and his owne profession. With licence of superior.

Broughton, Richard.

[64] p.By Richard Broughton.A reply to the work by Thomas Morton.Imprint from STC.Signatures: A² a²...

The truth and certainty of the Protestant faith with a short and plain account of the doctrine of the Romish Church in its visible opposition to Scripture and the very being of Christianity : to which is adjoined some serious considerations anent popery & the state of that controversy.

Fleming, Robert, 1630-1694.

January 1678

[6], 55 p.Attributed to Robert Fleming. Cf. Halkett & Laing (2nd ed.) Sometimes erroneously attribut...

A short summary of the principal controversies between the Church of England, and the church of Rome being a vindication of several Protestant doctrines, in answer to a late pamphlet intituled, Protestancy destitute of Scripture-proofs.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1687

[10], 150, [4] p.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.Attributed to William Sherlock. cf. ...

A second discourse in vindication of the Protestant grounds of faith, against the pretence of infallibility in the Roman Church in answer to The guide in controversies by R.H., Protestancy without principles, and Reason and religion, or, The certain rule of faith by E.W. : with a particular enquiry into the miracles of the Roman Church / by Edward Stillingfleet ...

Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699.

January 1673

[15], 295-695, [3] p.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library and Duke University Library.Form...

A direct answer vnto the scandalous exceptions, which Theophilus Higgons hath lately obiected against D. Morton In the which there is principally discussed, two of the most notorious obiections vsed by the Romanists, viz. 1. M. Luthers conference with the diuell, and 2. The sence of the article of Christ his descension into hell.

Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659.

January 1609

[6], 31, [1] p.By Thomas Morton.A reply to: Theophilus Higgons. The first motive of T.H. Maister of...

A iust and temperate defence of the fiue books of ecclesiastical policie: written by M. Richard Hooker against an vncharitable letter of certain English Protestants (as they tearme themselues) crauing resolution, in some matters of doctrine, which seeme to ouerthrow the foundation of religion, and the Church amongst vs. Written by William Covel Doctor in Diuinitie, and published by authority. The contents whereof are in the page following.

Covell, William, d. 1614?

January 1603

[8], 154 [i.e. 152] p.A reply to: A Christian letter of certaine English protestants, unfained favou...

A defense of the sincere and true translations of the holie Scriptures into the English tong against the manifolde cauils, friuolous quarels, and impudent slaunders of Gregorie Martin, one of the readers of popish diuinitie in the trayterous Seminarie of Rhemes. By William Fvlke D. in Diuinitie, and M. of Pembroke haule in Cambridge. Wherevnto is added a briefe confutation of all such quarrels & cauils, as haue bene of late vttered by diuerse papistes in their English pamphlets, against the writings of the saide William Fvlke.

Fulke, William, 1538-1589.

[4], 95, [1]; 144, 147-514, 517-532, [4]; 71, [1] p.A reprinting of and reply to: Martin, Gregory. ...

Two short discourses against the Romanists by Henry Dodwell ...

Dodwell, Henry, 1641-1711.

January 1676

[88], 31, 21, 120 [1] p.Each part has special title page.Reproduction of original in Cambridge Unive...

The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion.

Bell, Thomas, fl. 1593-1610.

January 1610

[20], 419, [1] p.Dedication signed: Thomas Bell.A response to: Woodward, Philip. Bels trial examined...

A catholike appeale for Protestants, out of the confessions of the Romane doctors particularly answering the mis-named Catholike apologie for the Romane faith, out of the Protestants: manifesting the antiquitie of our religion, and satisfying all scrupulous obiections which haue bene vrged against it. Written by Th. Morton Doctor of Diuinitie.

Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659.

January 1609

[24], 680, [20] p.A reply to: Anderton, Lawrence. The Protestants apologie for the Roman Church.Pri...

The XXXVI questions propounded for resolution of unlearned Protestants in matter of religion to the doctors of the prelaticall pretended reformed-Church of England, retorted for resolution on unlearned papists in matter of religion, to V.H. and V.N. doctors of the pretended Catholick Church of Rome / by T. Svvadlin ...

Swadlin, Thomas, 1600-1670.

[2], 59 p.Imperfect: stained, with loss of print.Reproduction of original in the Union Theological S...

Abstract

Extracted data

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items