Add to ORKG[2], 6 p.Dated and signed pseudonymously on page 6: Boston, Januar. 2. 1642. Abednego Canne.The imprint is false. This is a "London Royalist counterfeit print, [which] plays on the iconoclasm of the Puritans as directed against crosses, and suggests that as all windmills have cross pieces in their framework and flaunt the fact on hill-tops, they should all be pulled down as superstitious, .."--Madan.Annotation on Thomason copy: "June 23".Reproduction of the original in the British Library
[2], 6 p.Annotation on Thomason copy: "Dec: 6th".Reproduction of the original in the British Library
[2], 5, [1] p.False imprint. -- Cf. Madan.Satire on Parliamentary party; Hugh Peters & New England "...
[28]; xviij, [1] leaves.The imprint is false; printed at Wesel by J. Lambrecht? (STC).Signatures: A-...
8 p.The imprint is false. "A counterfeit London print, but a useful compendium of facts and argument...
[2], 22 p.Date of publication from Wing.Attributed to Edward Greaves.Imprint is false. "A London cou...
[2], 6 p.The imprint is false. "It is really printed in London, the Oxford imprint being counterfeit...
[2], 33, [1] p.The imprint is false. "A London counterfeit"--Madan.The roman numeral date is made wi...
[8] p.The imprint is false. "This is a defence of the Directory against the King's Proclamation, and...
1 sheet ([1] p.)Verse - "Truth I could chide you, Sirs, why how so late?".A Royalist satire on the P...
[2], 27, [1] p.The imprint is false. "A London counterfeit issued probably on May 7"--Madan.Annotati...
8 p.Partly in verse.The imprint is false; actually printed in London (Wing).Annotation on Thomason c...
[4], 40 p.Martin Mar-Priest = Richard Overton.The imprint is false.Thomason received his copy Decemb...
16 p.The writer, in spite of his subject, was very anxious to avoid giving offence to the Parliament...
8 p.A satire in verse.Caption title.The imprint, from colophon, is false; printed in London. (Lichfi...
[2], 6, [8] p.Imprint is false. "This is a poorly printed London piece, possibly printed for Leonard...
[2], 6 p.Annotation on Thomason copy: "Dec: 6th".Reproduction of the original in the British Library
[2], 5, [1] p.False imprint. -- Cf. Madan.Satire on Parliamentary party; Hugh Peters & New England "...
[28]; xviij, [1] leaves.The imprint is false; printed at Wesel by J. Lambrecht? (STC).Signatures: A-...
8 p.The imprint is false. "A counterfeit London print, but a useful compendium of facts and argument...
[2], 22 p.Date of publication from Wing.Attributed to Edward Greaves.Imprint is false. "A London cou...
[2], 6 p.The imprint is false. "It is really printed in London, the Oxford imprint being counterfeit...
[2], 33, [1] p.The imprint is false. "A London counterfeit"--Madan.The roman numeral date is made wi...
[8] p.The imprint is false. "This is a defence of the Directory against the King's Proclamation, and...
1 sheet ([1] p.)Verse - "Truth I could chide you, Sirs, why how so late?".A Royalist satire on the P...
[2], 27, [1] p.The imprint is false. "A London counterfeit issued probably on May 7"--Madan.Annotati...
8 p.Partly in verse.The imprint is false; actually printed in London (Wing).Annotation on Thomason c...
[4], 40 p.Martin Mar-Priest = Richard Overton.The imprint is false.Thomason received his copy Decemb...
16 p.The writer, in spite of his subject, was very anxious to avoid giving offence to the Parliament...
8 p.A satire in verse.Caption title.The imprint, from colophon, is false; printed in London. (Lichfi...
[2], 6, [8] p.Imprint is false. "This is a poorly printed London piece, possibly printed for Leonard...
[2], 6 p.Annotation on Thomason copy: "Dec: 6th".Reproduction of the original in the British Library
[2], 5, [1] p.False imprint. -- Cf. Madan.Satire on Parliamentary party; Hugh Peters & New England "...
[28]; xviij, [1] leaves.The imprint is false; printed at Wesel by J. Lambrecht? (STC).Signatures: A-...