Previous research proposed that an archaeological site's faunal assemblage cut mark angle patterning may vary based on the butchering and meat-sharing behaviors of the hominins that created the archaeological assemblage. This thesis indirectly tests this idea by comparing cut mark patterning of a Lower Paleolithic aged site to a Holocene aged site, determining that while butchering and meat-sharing behaviors may certainly affect cut mark patterning, the last burst in human brain growth is likely responsible for the variation seen between these two assemblages
International audienceLinear marks were observed on the maxillary zygomatic process of the early Ple...
The causes of morphological variation within Lower Palaeolithic stone tool assemblages have been sub...
The identification of human butchery-signatures on fauna from Lower Palaeolithic sites is well docum...
National audienceCutmarks provide empirical evidence for the exploitation of animal resources by pas...
Evidence and traces recorded on fossil bones, directly or indirectly produced by hominins, can shed ...
Studies of bone surface modifications (BSMs) such as cut marks are crucial to our understanding of h...
The frequency, anatomical location, and orientation of stone tool cutmarks have all been widely empl...
Cut marks on fossils from Plio‐Pleistocene faunal assemblages can elucidate the timing and nature of...
This dissertation examines morphological variability (differences in qualitative attributes and metr...
Three archaeological assemblages from Okote Member (1.5 Ma) deposits at Koobi Fora, Kenya described...
The archaeological site, 48PA551, is located in the Sunlight Basin near Cody, Wyoming and dates to t...
Abstract Identification of butchery marks on hominin fossils from the early Pleistocene is rare. Our...
A database of 128 measured incised butchery marks (i.e., the classic cut mark) was the basis for exp...
The PhD thesis Ancient Hunters, Modern Butchers presents a first detailed study of bone material fou...
2021 Spring.Includes bibliographical references.Cut marks on animal bones have the potential to info...
International audienceLinear marks were observed on the maxillary zygomatic process of the early Ple...
The causes of morphological variation within Lower Palaeolithic stone tool assemblages have been sub...
The identification of human butchery-signatures on fauna from Lower Palaeolithic sites is well docum...
National audienceCutmarks provide empirical evidence for the exploitation of animal resources by pas...
Evidence and traces recorded on fossil bones, directly or indirectly produced by hominins, can shed ...
Studies of bone surface modifications (BSMs) such as cut marks are crucial to our understanding of h...
The frequency, anatomical location, and orientation of stone tool cutmarks have all been widely empl...
Cut marks on fossils from Plio‐Pleistocene faunal assemblages can elucidate the timing and nature of...
This dissertation examines morphological variability (differences in qualitative attributes and metr...
Three archaeological assemblages from Okote Member (1.5 Ma) deposits at Koobi Fora, Kenya described...
The archaeological site, 48PA551, is located in the Sunlight Basin near Cody, Wyoming and dates to t...
Abstract Identification of butchery marks on hominin fossils from the early Pleistocene is rare. Our...
A database of 128 measured incised butchery marks (i.e., the classic cut mark) was the basis for exp...
The PhD thesis Ancient Hunters, Modern Butchers presents a first detailed study of bone material fou...
2021 Spring.Includes bibliographical references.Cut marks on animal bones have the potential to info...
International audienceLinear marks were observed on the maxillary zygomatic process of the early Ple...
The causes of morphological variation within Lower Palaeolithic stone tool assemblages have been sub...
The identification of human butchery-signatures on fauna from Lower Palaeolithic sites is well docum...