In 1980, a Springfield businessman began an initiative petition drive in support of a constitutional amendment that would limit state and local government taxation andspending. That amendment was adopted by the voters on November 4, 1980. It is generally known as the Hancock amendment, after the principal advocate Mel Hancock, and can be found in Article X Sections 18-24 of the Missouri Constitution. The amendment is modeled after a constitutional provision adopted by Michigan voters in 1978 known as the Headlee Amendment. Although Missouri courts have decided dozens of cases interpreting various provisions of the Hancock Amendment, none of the decisions have been based on the construction which Michigan courts have placed on the Headlee Am...
Missouri's first tax credit was authorized in 1973 and many more have been adopted in the following ...
During their campaign against Dakota Proposition, some of the opponents to that proposed constitutio...
This Note focuses on the 2009 challenge to the SB287 formula and specifically the arguments that sho...
On November 4, 1980, Missouri voters approved the Hancock Amendment (Hancock) to Missouri\u27s Const...
The Hancock Amendment to the Missouri Constitution became law in November 1980 after fifty-five perc...
In 1980, Missouri voters adopted an amendment to the Missouri Constitution. The amendment, commonly ...
Part I discusses the historical background and enactment of the amendment. Next, Part II outlines th...
This article reviews some federal and state constitutional law challenges to tax legislation in the ...
In 1979, Missouri property taxpayers paid a total of $1.15 billion in property taxes to local govern...
Powerpoint presentation concerning money and issues voting in the Missouri General Assembly from the...
On July 10, 1991, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that the state property tax system violates the Ne...
http://www.truman.missouri.edu/ipp/publications/index.asp?ViewBy=DateThis report summarizes how prop...
Initiative and referendum petitions provide citizens with the power to make and overturn existing la...
In response to the tax limitation movement which received national attention with the passage of Cal...
This report summarizes how proposals to revise the Missouri Constitution and Missouri laws are submi...
Missouri's first tax credit was authorized in 1973 and many more have been adopted in the following ...
During their campaign against Dakota Proposition, some of the opponents to that proposed constitutio...
This Note focuses on the 2009 challenge to the SB287 formula and specifically the arguments that sho...
On November 4, 1980, Missouri voters approved the Hancock Amendment (Hancock) to Missouri\u27s Const...
The Hancock Amendment to the Missouri Constitution became law in November 1980 after fifty-five perc...
In 1980, Missouri voters adopted an amendment to the Missouri Constitution. The amendment, commonly ...
Part I discusses the historical background and enactment of the amendment. Next, Part II outlines th...
This article reviews some federal and state constitutional law challenges to tax legislation in the ...
In 1979, Missouri property taxpayers paid a total of $1.15 billion in property taxes to local govern...
Powerpoint presentation concerning money and issues voting in the Missouri General Assembly from the...
On July 10, 1991, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that the state property tax system violates the Ne...
http://www.truman.missouri.edu/ipp/publications/index.asp?ViewBy=DateThis report summarizes how prop...
Initiative and referendum petitions provide citizens with the power to make and overturn existing la...
In response to the tax limitation movement which received national attention with the passage of Cal...
This report summarizes how proposals to revise the Missouri Constitution and Missouri laws are submi...
Missouri's first tax credit was authorized in 1973 and many more have been adopted in the following ...
During their campaign against Dakota Proposition, some of the opponents to that proposed constitutio...
This Note focuses on the 2009 challenge to the SB287 formula and specifically the arguments that sho...