Punishment has mostly focused on achieving its objectives without considering the impact a sentence will have on the rights of the offender and those under the offender's care. Drawing on the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, the author illustrates how the Court, relying on the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, has shifted the punishment discourse from one that emphasises the objectives of punishment to one that calls upon sentencing officers to not only emphasise the objectives of punishment, but also to consider the effect the punishment will have on the children if their primary caregiver was sentenced to imprisonment
In Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education, the Constitutional Court upheld the law...
The principle, the rights of the child shall be of paramount importance in all decisions affecting t...
For over a century, the role of court sentencing on crime deterrence has generated significant debat...
This contribution considers the Constitutional Court’s judgments about aspects of sentencing over th...
Since 25 January 1994, when the interim Constitution came into operation, South Africa's criminal j...
This contribution considers the Constitutional Court of South Africa’s judgments regarding spects o...
Prior to the change brought about by S v M,[1] the interests of children were only considered as a c...
Prior to the change brought about by S v M,1 the interests of children were only considered as a cir...
Traditionally a judicial officer was not required to consider the effects of the imposed sentence o...
Master of Laws. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2016.The 1990s gave momentum to the C...
The role of Deterrence and Retribution in sentencing in South African Courts Since the early histo...
Prior to the change brought about by S v M,1 the interests of children were only considered as a ci...
Masters Degree. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.Prior to the Child Justice Act 75 of 2...
Magister Legum - LLMThe detention of juvenile offenders is not encouraged by both the Constitution a...
The abolition of corporal punishment in S v Williams and Others 1995 (3) SA 632 (CC) provided the s...
In Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education, the Constitutional Court upheld the law...
The principle, the rights of the child shall be of paramount importance in all decisions affecting t...
For over a century, the role of court sentencing on crime deterrence has generated significant debat...
This contribution considers the Constitutional Court’s judgments about aspects of sentencing over th...
Since 25 January 1994, when the interim Constitution came into operation, South Africa's criminal j...
This contribution considers the Constitutional Court of South Africa’s judgments regarding spects o...
Prior to the change brought about by S v M,[1] the interests of children were only considered as a c...
Prior to the change brought about by S v M,1 the interests of children were only considered as a cir...
Traditionally a judicial officer was not required to consider the effects of the imposed sentence o...
Master of Laws. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2016.The 1990s gave momentum to the C...
The role of Deterrence and Retribution in sentencing in South African Courts Since the early histo...
Prior to the change brought about by S v M,1 the interests of children were only considered as a ci...
Masters Degree. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.Prior to the Child Justice Act 75 of 2...
Magister Legum - LLMThe detention of juvenile offenders is not encouraged by both the Constitution a...
The abolition of corporal punishment in S v Williams and Others 1995 (3) SA 632 (CC) provided the s...
In Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education, the Constitutional Court upheld the law...
The principle, the rights of the child shall be of paramount importance in all decisions affecting t...
For over a century, the role of court sentencing on crime deterrence has generated significant debat...