The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits excessive criminal sanctions, and the Supreme Court has held that this provision has special application in situations dealing with juvenile offenders. This Commentary looks at the recent Supreme Court case of Montgomery v. Louisiana, in which the Court held that there was a constititutional prohibition of life sentences without parole for juvenile offenders. This Commentary argues that this is the correct result under the Court’s Eighth Amendment jurisprudence but that the Court should also have held that the sole remedy for such constitutional violations is resentencing
With its narrow ruling, Miller has taken the Eighth Amendment kids are different jurisprudence on a ...
In Miller v. Alabama, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a five to four opinion written by ...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits excessive criminal sanctions, and the Suprem...
Miller v. Alabama appeared to strengthen constitutional protections for juvenile sentencing that the...
In June 2012, the United States Supreme Court found mandatory life-without-parole sentences against ...
In June 2012, the United States Supreme Court decided Miller v. Alabama, marking significant progres...
Across the country, states are grappling with how to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent dec...
This Article focuses very little on the implications of Miller and Graham for the population they mo...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Miller v. Alabama found that juvenile life without the pos...
In Miller v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court held that statutes imposing mandatory sentences of life...
The Supreme Court has held that life without parole is an unconstitutional sentence for nearly all j...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
Over the last decade, the Supreme Court pieced together a clear doctrine related to sentencing juven...
In Miller v. Alabama and Montgomery v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court held mandatory juvenile life wit...
With its narrow ruling, Miller has taken the Eighth Amendment kids are different jurisprudence on a ...
In Miller v. Alabama, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a five to four opinion written by ...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits excessive criminal sanctions, and the Suprem...
Miller v. Alabama appeared to strengthen constitutional protections for juvenile sentencing that the...
In June 2012, the United States Supreme Court found mandatory life-without-parole sentences against ...
In June 2012, the United States Supreme Court decided Miller v. Alabama, marking significant progres...
Across the country, states are grappling with how to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent dec...
This Article focuses very little on the implications of Miller and Graham for the population they mo...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Miller v. Alabama found that juvenile life without the pos...
In Miller v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court held that statutes imposing mandatory sentences of life...
The Supreme Court has held that life without parole is an unconstitutional sentence for nearly all j...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
Over the last decade, the Supreme Court pieced together a clear doctrine related to sentencing juven...
In Miller v. Alabama and Montgomery v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court held mandatory juvenile life wit...
With its narrow ruling, Miller has taken the Eighth Amendment kids are different jurisprudence on a ...
In Miller v. Alabama, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a five to four opinion written by ...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...