Add to ORKGCarrington notes that because judges in trial and intermediate courts are accountable to highest courts, it is the latter that are responsible for keeping the faith with democratic traditions
Despite their widespread use, many rightfully question the prudence of using popular elections to fi...
This is a contribution to a symposium on David M. Driesen\u27s book, The Specter of Dictatorship (...
Judicial independence is critical to enforcement of separation of powers, effective protection of pr...
Carrington notes that because judges in trial and intermediate courts are accountable to highest cou...
textThe special role courts play in a democracy requires designers of constitutions to consider the ...
Independence from extrinsic influence is, we know, indispensable to public trust in the integrity of...
Because courts are both conflict-resolving and lawmaking bodies, they should be both independent and...
The article examines the threat to judicial independence from political calls for more judicial ac...
It is hardly novel to suggest that judicial elections, including retention elections, illustrate pro...
Justice Robert F. Utter of the Washington Supreme Court analyzes the nature of judicial review by st...
Independent judges are thought to promote democratic regime survival by allowing perceived violation...
“The bedrock of our democracy is the rule of law and that means we have to have an independent judic...
In recent years, we have seen an escalation of attacks on the independence of the judiciary. Governm...
Traditional democratic political theorists promote the idea that Supreme Court exercises of judicial...
The question of judicial accountability and independence arises primarily in the context of state co...
Despite their widespread use, many rightfully question the prudence of using popular elections to fi...
This is a contribution to a symposium on David M. Driesen\u27s book, The Specter of Dictatorship (...
Judicial independence is critical to enforcement of separation of powers, effective protection of pr...
Carrington notes that because judges in trial and intermediate courts are accountable to highest cou...
textThe special role courts play in a democracy requires designers of constitutions to consider the ...
Independence from extrinsic influence is, we know, indispensable to public trust in the integrity of...
Because courts are both conflict-resolving and lawmaking bodies, they should be both independent and...
The article examines the threat to judicial independence from political calls for more judicial ac...
It is hardly novel to suggest that judicial elections, including retention elections, illustrate pro...
Justice Robert F. Utter of the Washington Supreme Court analyzes the nature of judicial review by st...
Independent judges are thought to promote democratic regime survival by allowing perceived violation...
“The bedrock of our democracy is the rule of law and that means we have to have an independent judic...
In recent years, we have seen an escalation of attacks on the independence of the judiciary. Governm...
Traditional democratic political theorists promote the idea that Supreme Court exercises of judicial...
The question of judicial accountability and independence arises primarily in the context of state co...
Despite their widespread use, many rightfully question the prudence of using popular elections to fi...
This is a contribution to a symposium on David M. Driesen\u27s book, The Specter of Dictatorship (...
Judicial independence is critical to enforcement of separation of powers, effective protection of pr...