We report evidence from a dataset of federal district judges from 2001 to 2002 that district judges adjust their opinion-writing practices to minimize their workload while maximizing their reputation and chance for elevation to a higher court. District judges in circuits with politically uniform circuit judges are better able to predict what opinions will get affirmed by the circuit court, leading to higher publication rates and a higher affirmance rate. In contrast, district judges in circuits with politically diverse circuit judges are less able to predict the preferences of the reviewing circuit court panel, leading district judges to publish fewer but higher quality opinions in an effort to maximize their affirmance rate
The U.S. District Courts resolve the vast majority of cases in the U.S. federal legal system, but we...
Since 1980, District CourtJudges, designated pursuant to federal statute, have helped decide over 75...
Recent research has shown that judges on panels decide cases differently than they do individually. ...
We report evidence from a dataset of federal district judges from 2001 to 2002 that district judges ...
We report evidence from a dataset of federal district judges from 2001 to 2002 that district judges ...
Part I of this Essay describes in detail the institutional setting in which district judges function...
Understanding judicial decision-making requires attention to the specific institutional settings in ...
This Essay tackles the complicated relationships within the federal judicial hierarchy with a focus ...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...
According to a number of studies and commentators, a serious caseload crisis faces the federal court...
Redistricting cases offer a unique opportunity to test the effects of partisan favoritism in judging...
Redistricting cases offer a unique opportunity to test the effects of partisan favoritism in judging...
Since 1980, District CourtJudges, designated pursuant to federal statute, have helped decide over 75...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...
The U.S. District Courts resolve the vast majority of cases in the U.S. federal legal system, but we...
Since 1980, District CourtJudges, designated pursuant to federal statute, have helped decide over 75...
Recent research has shown that judges on panels decide cases differently than they do individually. ...
We report evidence from a dataset of federal district judges from 2001 to 2002 that district judges ...
We report evidence from a dataset of federal district judges from 2001 to 2002 that district judges ...
Part I of this Essay describes in detail the institutional setting in which district judges function...
Understanding judicial decision-making requires attention to the specific institutional settings in ...
This Essay tackles the complicated relationships within the federal judicial hierarchy with a focus ...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...
According to a number of studies and commentators, a serious caseload crisis faces the federal court...
Redistricting cases offer a unique opportunity to test the effects of partisan favoritism in judging...
Redistricting cases offer a unique opportunity to test the effects of partisan favoritism in judging...
Since 1980, District CourtJudges, designated pursuant to federal statute, have helped decide over 75...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...
The U.S. District Courts resolve the vast majority of cases in the U.S. federal legal system, but we...
Since 1980, District CourtJudges, designated pursuant to federal statute, have helped decide over 75...
Recent research has shown that judges on panels decide cases differently than they do individually. ...